Zundel v. Zundel

Summary

The court upheld the judgment voiding the bill of transfer because the evidence supported a finding that Stephen Zundel exercised undue influence over his father. It also held that any error concerning the admission of the father's statements was nonprejudicial, and that the district court acted within its discretion in quashing a post-trial subpoena issued after discovery had closed. The court declined to consider Stephen's judicial-bias argument because he had not raised it below.