Arkansas lawChild SupportAlimonySpousal Support

How to Modify Alimony in Arkansas

September 21, 2026 · LawDiver Research Team

Either party may petition at any time for review or modification based upon a significant and material change of circumstances (income loss, retirement, health, or changed need). That is what separates Arkansas modifying alimony from a generic national summary. Read Ark. Code § 9-12-312(a)(7) before the background sections below. Lump-sum alimony awarded as a property division is generally not modifiable. Remarriage of the recipient or death of either party ends the obligation unless the decree provides otherwise; cohabitation may support modification.

Grounds that most often succeed

Retirement. Many states now treat reaching full retirement age as a presumptive or statutory ground. Early or voluntary retirement is scrutinized: courts ask whether it was in good faith, whether it was foreseeable at divorce, and whether the recipient had a chance to save.
Involuntary income loss. Layoffs, business failure, disability, or industry collapse — with proof of diligent job-seeking. Voluntary underemployment is commonly met with income imputation instead of relief.
The recipient's changed need. Improved earnings, remarriage-adjacent cohabitation, an inheritance, or reduced expenses.
Health changes. New disability or extraordinary medical costs on either side.
Cohabitation. Remarriage of the recipient or death of either party ends the obligation unless the decree provides otherwise; cohabitation may support modification.

Grounds that rarely work: a new partner's income without statutory cohabitation, ordinary inflation, the payor's new family expenses standing alone, or a temporary dip in earnings.

Cohabitation and remarriage

Remarriage of the recipient or death of either party ends the obligation unless the decree provides otherwise; cohabitation may support modification.

Cohabitation cases are intensely fact-driven: shared finances, shared household expenses, the relationship's public character, and its duration all matter. Arkansas procedure requires proof — surveillance or speculation is not enough, and the recipient gets discovery and a hearing before payments stop. Until a court order issues, keep paying.

Step-by-step: how to file

Read the decree and any incorporated agreement. Lump-sum alimony awarded as a property division is generally not modifiable. Confirm the court retained jurisdiction to modify.
Confirm the forum. Modification goes to a petition to modify filed in the circuit court that entered the decree. If a party has moved away, UIFSA and registration rules determine where the petition belongs.
Gather evidence dated to the change. Termination notices, disability awards, pension and Social Security statements, tax returns, medical records, or evidence of the recipient's cohabitation.
File and serve promptly. Prospective; amounts already accrued under the decree remain due.
Exchange financial disclosure. Many courts require updated financial affidavits; self-employment cases often add forensic accounting or a vocational expert.
Seek temporary relief if needed. Where circumstances are dire, ask the court for interim reduction or suspension pending the full hearing — Arkansas judges can grant temporary remedies in appropriate cases.
Litigate, mediate, or stipulate. A settlement must be reduced to an order and entered before payment obligations change.

A concrete Arkansas scenario

Here is one way the Arkansas pieces fit together. Change any fact and the statute may point somewhere else.

A former spouse in Arkansas asks to change periodic alimony after retirement or a drop in income.

File a petition to modify filed in the circuit court that entered the decree.
Match the facts to the Arkansas standard: Either party may petition at any time for review or modification based upon a significant and material change of circumstances (income loss, retirement, health, or changed need).
Check whether this award can be modified at all: Lump-sum alimony awarded as a property division is generally not modifiable.
If the request is to end support, prove a trigger: Remarriage of the recipient or death of either party ends the obligation unless the decree provides otherwise; cohabitation may support modification.

Prospective; amounts already accrued under the decree remain due. The forum is the circuit court (domestic relations division) or the Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE).

When the change takes effect

Prospective; amounts already accrued under the decree remain due.

The corollary: unilaterally reducing or stopping payments before an order issues builds arrears, interest, and contempt exposure — even if you ultimately win the modification.

Awards that cannot be modified (or are hard to change)

Lump-sum alimony awarded as a property division is generally not modifiable.

Common traps:

Lump-sum or property-division awards styled as alimony are usually final when entered.
Agreement language that waives modification binds the parties even though the statute would allow a petition.
Expired terms — once a fixed term lapses, most states will not revive it; a timely pre-expiration motion is critical.
Jurisdiction reservations — in some states, if the decree did not expressly reserve jurisdiction to modify, no later court can.

Case law: how Arkansas courts decide alimony modification

These LawDiver opinions show how Arkansas appellate courts weigh changed circumstances, retirement, and cohabitation:

In Re Guidelines for Child Support Enf.

In Re Guidelines for Child Support Enf., 301 Ark. 627 (1990)

…is entered, the court shall make such orders concerning the alimony of the wife or the husband and care of the children, if there are any, as are reasonable from the circumstances of the parties and the nature of the case. (2) In determining a reasonable amount of support initially or upon review to be paid by the noncustodial parent, the court shall refer to the most recent re…

In Re Guidelines for Child Support Enf. is worth reading on Arkansas alimony modification because the court put the point in its own words: "is entered, the court shall make such orders concerning the alimony of the wife or the husband and care of the children, if there are any, as are reasonable from the circumstances of the parties and the nature of the case. (2) In determining a reasonable amount of support initial" Use that passage as the starting point, then read the facts that precede it.

Randy TUCKER v. ARKANSAS OFFICE of CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and Regina L. Tucker

Randy TUCKER v. ARKANSAS OFFICE of CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and Regina L. Tucker, 368 Ark. 481 (2007)

…come should include contributions made to retirement plans, alimony paid, and self-employed health insurance paid; this figure appears on fine 22 of the current federal income tax form. Depreciation should be allowed as a deduction only to the extent that it reflects actual decrease in value of an asset. Also, the court shall consider the amount the payor is capable of earning…

Randy TUCKER v. ARKANSAS OFFICE of CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and Regina L. Tucker is worth reading on Arkansas alimony modification because the court put the point in its own words: "Depreciation should be allowed as a deduction only to the extent that it reflects actual decrease in value of an asset." Use that passage as the starting point, then read the facts that precede it.

Edgar D. MILLER, Appellant v. ARKANSAS OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Appellee

Edgar D. MILLER, Appellant v. ARKANSAS OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Appellee, 2015 Ark. App. LEXIS 239 (2015)

…of the children, if there ai’e any, and an order concerning alimony, if applicable, as are reasonable from the circumstances of the parties and the nature of the case). However, under the same subsection, the statute goes further to allow the courts to provide for the continuation of support for an individual with a disability that affects the ability of the individual to live…

On alimony modification, Edgar D. MILLER, Appellant v. ARKANSAS OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Appellee speaks to the Arkansas dispute in this passage: "of the children, if there ai’e any, and an order concerning alimony, if applicable, as are reasonable from the circumstances of the parties and the nature of the case). However, under the same subsection, the statute goes further to allow the courts to provide for the continuatio" The surrounding opinion shows how the court applied that language to the record.

OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT v. Jimmy Clyde RAGLAND

OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT v. Jimmy Clyde RAGLAND, 330 Ark. 280 (1997)

…the chancery court awarded the obligee a monthly amount of alimony. The obligor later moved to Florida and fell behind on payments, and the obligee sought a decree for the amount in arrears. While the chancery court recognized that the obligor was delinquent on the payments, it nonetheless refused to render a decree for the arrearage because the entire arrearage had accumulate…

Arkansas opinions such as OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT v. Jimmy Clyde RAGLAND are cited where alimony modification is disputed. The court stated: "The obligor later moved to Florida and fell behind on payments, and the obligee sought a decree for the amount in arrears." That is the language to brief; the rest of the decision supplies the procedural posture.

Vincent DAVIE v. OFFICE of CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT

Vincent DAVIE v. OFFICE of CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, 349 Ark. 187 (2002)

…nd similar proceedings for enforcement of child-support and alimony obligations from federal moneys payable based on “remuneration from employment.” * This exception could not apply to federal SSI benefits. SSI benefits are not remuneration for any past or present employment. No premiums, deposits, or other payment have been paid to qualify for them. Put simply, SSI is fede…

Vincent DAVIE v. OFFICE of CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT is worth reading on Arkansas alimony modification because the court put the point in its own words: "This exception could not apply to federal SSI benefits. SSI benefits are not remuneration for any past or present employment. No premiums, deposits, or other payment have been paid to qualify for them." Use that passage as the starting point, then read the facts that precede it.

Martha S. DAVIS v. OFFICE of CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT

Martha S. DAVIS v. OFFICE of CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, 68 Ark. App. 88 (1999)

…recipient’s right to such funds.” Morris, supra. However, “alimony and child support are not a debt in the same sense as a debt owed to a creditor. . . . They are a duty of a higher obligation.” Griggs, supra. Applying the standard articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Rose, we find that the State is not preempted from ordering that a parent whose sole source of in…

Practitioners open Martha S. DAVIS v. OFFICE of CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT when Arkansas alimony modification turns on the distinction in this sentence: "Morris, supra. However, “alimony and child support are not a debt in the same sense as a debt owed to a creditor. . . . They are a duty of a higher obligation.” Griggs, supra." Do not lift it out of the facts the court was deciding.

Randy TUCKER v. Regina TUCKER and Office of Child Support Enforcement

Randy TUCKER v. Regina TUCKER and Office of Child Support Enforcement, 96 Ark. App. 194 (2006)

…come should include contributions made to retirement plans, alimony paid and self-employed health insurance paid. . . . Depreciation should be allowed as a deduction only to the extent that it reflects actual decrease in value of an asset. Also, a court shall consider the amount the payor is capable of earning or a net worth approach based on property, life style, etc. (Emphasi…

On alimony modification, Randy TUCKER v. Regina TUCKER and Office of Child Support Enforcement speaks to the Arkansas dispute in this passage: "Depreciation should be allowed as a deduction only to the extent that it reflects actual decrease in value of an asset. Also, a court shall consider the amount the payor is capable of earning or a net worth approach based on property, life style, etc." The surrounding opinion shows how the court applied that language to the record.

OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and Denise F. Morbit v. Kenneth HARPER

OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and Denise F. Morbit v. Kenneth HARPER, 2013 Ark. App. 171 (2013)

…appellee’s May 27, 2008 motion | Requested modification of alimony, in addition to child support, he never got a final ruling as to modification of alimony before it was terminated automatically upon appellant Denise Morbit’s marriage on December 29, 2008. And though appellant OCSE cited appellee’s failure to pay spousal support, among other things, in its December 18, 2008 mo…

OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and Denise F. Morbit v. Kenneth HARPER is worth reading on Arkansas alimony modification because the court put the point in its own words: "May 27, 2008 motion | Requested modification of alimony, in addition to child support, he never got a final ruling as to modification of alimony before it was terminated automatically upon appellant Denise Morbit’s marriage on December 29, 2008." Use that passage as the starting point, then read the facts that precede it.

Practical checklist before you file

Identify which type of alimony your decree awards — the modification rules differ by type.
Confirm the decree or agreement does not bar modification.
Document the change with third-party records, not just testimony.
For retirement motions: assemble pension statements, Social Security estimates, the divorce-era financial disclosures, and evidence of good faith.
For cohabitation petitions: gather admissible evidence and expect a discovery fight and an evidentiary hearing.
Keep paying until the new order is signed; calendar the effective-date rules under Ark. Code § 9-12-312(a)(7).
Search LawDiver for recent Arkansas appellate decisions before filing.

Key takeaways

Arkansas calls these payments alimony, governed for modification purposes by Ark. Code § 9-12-312(a)(7).
The legal standard: Either party may petition at any time for review or modification based upon a significant and material change of circumstances (income loss, retirement, health, or changed need).
Prospective; amounts already accrued under the decree remain due.
Termination events: Remarriage of the recipient or death of either party ends the obligation unless the decree provides otherwise; cohabitation may support modification.
Lump-sum alimony awarded as a property division is generally not modifiable.
File in petition to modify filed in the circuit court that entered the decree — do not wait: Prospective; amounts already accrued under the decree remain due.
Companion reading: Arkansas alimony guide and how to modify child support in Arkansas.

The legal standard in Arkansas

Either party may petition at any time for review or modification based upon a significant and material change of circumstances (income loss, retirement, health, or changed need).

Courts start from the decree, not from scratch. The judge asks what the parties and the court knew when alimony was set, what has changed since, and whether the change is significant and durable enough to make the existing terms unreasonable. The moving party carries the burden, and documentation — tax returns, pension statements, medical records, lease agreements — decides most of these cases.

Frequently asked questions

Can alimony be modified in Arkansas?

Yes, in most cases. Either party may petition at any time for review or modification based upon a significant and material change of circumstances (income loss, retirement, health, or changed need).

Does retirement end alimony in Arkansas?

Retirement is a recognized ground in Arkansas — Ark. Code § 9-12-312(a)(7) governs how courts weigh it. Reaching normal retirement age carries more weight than early or voluntary retirement, and the recipient's own retirement readiness is considered.

Does my ex's cohabitation stop alimony?

Remarriage of the recipient or death of either party ends the obligation unless the decree provides otherwise; cohabitation may support modification. You must petition the court and prove the statutory elements — the obligation does not end by operation of the new relationship alone until a judge so orders (unless Arkansas's statute makes termination automatic on remarriage).

Can alimony be increased?

Yes, where the statute permits. Recipients who prove a material increase in need — often medical — can seek upward modification, subject to the payor's ability to pay.

Can Arkansas courts modify alimony retroactively?