Supreme Court of the United States

Golan v. Holder

January 18, 2012565 U.S. 302

Summary

Justice Ginsburg’s opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Sotomayor, upheld §514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, which restored copyright protection to certain foreign works previously in the United States public domain. The Copyright Clause does not categorically prohibit protecting public-domain works, and Congress rationally could conclude that full participation in the international copyright system would promote knowledge and learning. Restoration also does not violate the First Amendment: the statute preserves the idea/expression distinction and fair use, and heightened scrutiny is unnecessary. Justice Breyer, joined by Justice Alito, dissented, reasoning that withdrawing existing works from the public domain restricts dissemination without providing a sufficient incentive for new creation, exceeding the Copyright Clause’s authority when interpreted in light of the First Amendment. Justice Kagan did not participate.

Holding

  • Congressional authority to restore copyright protection to public-domain works.. Section 514 does not violate the Copyright Clause’s limited-times requirement merely because it protects works previously in the public domain.
  • Whether copyright legislation must directly induce the creation of new works.. Promoting the Progress of Science is not confined to providing incentives for new creation, and §514 falls within Congress’s Copyright Clause authority.
  • First Amendment limits on restoration of copyright protection.. The First Amendment does not prohibit §514’s restoration of copyright protection, and the statute does not require heightened First Amendment scrutiny.

Docket 10-545

Cited authorities

  • NAFTA
  • NAFTA
  • 17 U.S.C. §107
  • 102 Stat. 2853
  • 102 Stat. 2860
  • 102 Stat. 2853
  • 107 Stat. 2115
  • 20 Colum.-VLA J.L. & Arts 157

Cited by