Supreme Court of the United States
United States v. Juvenile Male
June 7, 2010560 U.S. 558
Summary
The Supreme Court examined whether the respondent’s case was moot, given that he remained on the Montana sex‑offender registry potentially because of a federal juvenile‑supervision order. Finding that a favorable decision could affect that registration, the Court held the case was not moot and granted certiorari to certify a question to the Montana Supreme Court regarding the interplay of the federal order and state registration law.
Holding
- Whether the case is moot, i.e., whether the respondent has a live case or controversy sufficient to redress the collateral consequence of remaining on the Montana sex‑offender registry tied to the federal juvenile‑supervision order.. The case is not moot; certiorari is granted to certify the question to the Montana Supreme Court.
Docket 09-940
Cited authorities
- Montana Rule of Appellate Procedure 15
- Mont. Code Ann. §§ 46-23-502
- Mont. Code Ann. § 41-5-1513(l)(c)
- Rule 15(6)(a)(iii)
- 18 U.S.C. § 5031
- 120 Stat. 590
- 42 U.S.C. § 16901
- 72 FR 8897
Cited by
- (HC) Murphy v. Attorney General of California
- United States v. Juvenile Male
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juvenile Male, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America…
- Phillip Wood, Petitioner v. John E. Main, Respondent
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juvenile Male, Defendant-Appellant; United States of America…
- Eric Bacon, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Tom Neer, St. Charles County Sheriff; James Keathley, Colonel
- Management and Training Corporation, Plaintiff v. the United States of America, Defendant
- Anchor Savings Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff v. the United States of America, Defendant