Supreme Court of the United States
Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen General Committee of Adjustment…
December 8, 2009558 U.S. 67
Summary
The Supreme Court held that the National Railroad Adjustment Board (NRAB) panel erred in dismissing employees' claims for lack of jurisdiction due to insufficient proof of conferencing. The Court clarified that the conference requirement is a claim-processing rule, not a jurisdictional prerequisite under the Railway Labor Act. Consequently, the panel exceeded its authority in dismissing the claims, and the Court affirmed the Seventh Circuit's judgment setting aside the panel's orders on statutory grounds.
Holding
- Whether the conferencing requirement under the RLA is jurisdictional.. The conferencing requirement is not jurisdictional; it is a claim-processing rule.
- Whether the panel could dismiss for lack of jurisdiction based on non-compliance with a claim-processing rule.. The panel exceeded its authority by treating a claim-processing rule as jurisdictional.
Docket 08-604
Cited authorities
- Rule 41(b)
- CA10
- 45 U.S.C. § 153
- 44 Stat. 577
- 45 U.S.C. § 151
- 45 U.S.C. § 153
- 29 C.F.R. § 301.5
- 45 U.S.C. § 153
Cited by
- Obaydullah, Detainee, Guantanamo Bay and Sami Al Hajj, as Next Friend of Obaydullah, Appellants v. Barack Obama…
- Colbert Rittgers v. United States of America
- Fintech Fund, Flp v. Ralph Horne
- United States v. Jorge Ivan Moreno-Mendoza, Also Known as Jose Manuel Moreno-Mendoza
- United States v. Jose Ivan Eligio-Rodriguez
- United States v. Jose Manuel Felix-Felix
- United States v. Sobec Lopez-Urgel
- United States v. Juan Miguel Leon-Gonzalez