Supreme Court of the United States
Dean v. United States
April 29, 2009556 U.S. 568
Summary
Chief Justice Roberts, joined by Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, and Alito, held that 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(1)(A)(iii) requires no separate proof of intent to discharge a firearm: its ten-year mandatory minimum applies to accidental as well as intentional discharges during the specified crimes. The statutory text and structure also foreclose applying the rule of lenity. The Court affirmed the Eleventh Circuit. Justice Stevens dissented without joiners, reasoning that the escalating penalties, legislative history, and presumption of mens rea require intentional discharge. Justice Breyer separately dissented without joiners, emphasizing statutory ambiguity and the special force of lenity when interpreting mandatory minimum sentences. Outside confirmation was unavailable; this analysis rests on the supplied opinion text.
Holding
- Whether the discharge provision requires a separate showing of intent.. Section 924(c)(1)(A)(iii) requires no separate proof of intent and applies when a firearm is discharged during the specified crimes, whether intentionally or accidentally.
- Whether lenity requires excluding accidental discharges.. The rule of lenity does not apply because the discharge provision is not grievously ambiguous.
Docket 08-5274
Cited authorities
Cited by
- United States v. James
- In Re Nathan W. Canto, Debtor
- Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Delaware Natural…
- Gary Minda, Nancy Findlay Frost v. United States
- United States of America, ex rel. Heidi Heineman-Guta, Relator, Plaintiff, Appellant v. Guidant Corporation; Boston…
- United States of America, Appellee v. Edwin Cabrera-Rivera, Defendant, Appellant.
- In re: CCA Recordings 2255 Litigation
- Gill v. USA - 2255