Supreme Court of the United States
Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States ex rel. Wilson
June 20, 2005545 U.S. 409
Summary
The Supreme Court held that the False Claims Act's 6-year statute of limitations does not apply to retaliation actions under § 3730(h). Because no federal limitations period expressly covers retaliation claims, the Court concluded that the most closely analogous state limitations period must apply. Justice Stevens concurred in the judgment, and Justice Breyer dissented, arguing the 6-year period should govern all § 3730 actions to ensure uniformity.
Holding
- Whether 31 U.S.C. § 3731(b)(1) applies to § 3730(h) retaliation actions. The 6-year limitations period in § 3731(b)(1) does not apply to retaliation actions
Docket 04-169
Cited authorities
- Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-51m
- Fla. Stat. §§ 112.3187
- Idaho Code § 6-2105(2)
- Kan. Stat. Ann. § 75-2973(h)
- Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-212
- N.C. Gen. Stat. § 126-86
- Utah Code Ann. §§ 78-12-29
- Va. Code Ann. §§ 8.01-243
Cited by
- United States of America, ex rel. Elaine George v. Boston Scientific Corporation and Guidant Corporation
- United States v. Bnp Paribas Sa Bnp Paribas North America Bnp Paribas Houston Agency and Jovenal Miranda Cruz
- Eder v. City of Burleson
- Paige v. AM Hospice, Inc.
- Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC, Plaintiff, Appellee v. Weymouth, Massachusetts; Weymouth Conservation Commission…
- (PS) Warfield v. Solano County Superior Court
- United States v. Empowering Integrated Care Solutions, LLC
- Brooks v. Devereaux