Supreme Court of the United States

Kontrick v. Ryan

January 14, 2004540 U.S. 443

Summary

Justice Ginsburg delivered the unanimous opinion holding that Bankruptcy Rules 4004 and 9006(b)(3) establish claim-processing deadlines, not limits on bankruptcy courts’ subject-matter jurisdiction. A debtor forfeits the right to invoke those deadlines by failing to raise untimeliness before the bankruptcy court adjudicates the creditor’s objection to discharge on the merits. Because Kontrick first asserted the defense on reconsideration after losing on the merits, the Court affirmed the Seventh Circuit. The Court did not decide whether equitable exceptions could excuse an untimely objection. There were no separate opinions.

Holding

  • Whether the Bankruptcy Rules’ deadlines for objections to discharge are jurisdictional.. The deadlines in Bankruptcy Rules 4004 and 9006(b)(3) are claim-processing rules, not restrictions on bankruptcy courts’ subject-matter jurisdiction.
  • Whether Kontrick could invoke the filing deadline after adjudication on the merits.. A debtor forfeits the right to rely on Rule 4004’s filing deadline by failing to raise it before the bankruptcy court reaches the merits of the creditor’s objection to discharge.

Docket 02-819

Cited authorities

  • Rule 4004(b)
  • Rule 4004(a)
  • Rule 4004(a)
  • Rule 4004(b)
  • Rule 4004(a)
  • Rule 9006(b)(3)
  • Rule 4004(a)
  • Rule 4004(b)

Cited by

Kontrick v. Ryan (SCOTUS 2004), 540 U.S. 443 | LawDiver