Supreme Court of the United States
Iowa v. Tovar
March 8, 2004541 U.S. 77
Summary
Justice Ginsburg delivered the unanimous opinion holding that the Sixth Amendment does not require a court accepting an uncounseled guilty plea to warn specifically that counsel might identify an overlooked defense or provide an independent assessment of whether pleading guilty is wise. The constitutional requirement is satisfied by informing the accused of the nature of the charges, the right to counsel regarding the plea, and the range of allowable punishments. Whether a waiver is intelligent depends on the circumstances, including the defendant’s sophistication, the complexity of the charge, and the stage of proceedings; the Constitution does not prescribe the Iowa Supreme Court’s mandatory script. The Court reversed and remanded. There were no separate opinions.
Holding
- Required warnings for waiver of counsel when entering a guilty plea.. The Sixth Amendment does not require either of Iowa’s prescribed warnings about overlooked defenses and independent legal advice. The constitutional requirement is satisfied when the accused is informed of the nature of the charges, the right to counsel regarding the plea, and the range of allowable punishments.
Docket 02-1541
Cited authorities
- Iowa Rule of Criminal Procedure 10(2)
Cited by
- Brandon Crosby v. A. Arthur
- State of Minnesota, Respondent v. Don Jones, Appellant
- United States v. Jorge Alberto Hernandez-Castillo
- United States v. Edwin Del Cid-Perez
- Erwin Alexander Edwards v. Commonwealth of Virginia
- Erwin Alexander Edwards v. Commonwealth of Virginia
- Brian Shawn Gilley, Appellant v. the State of Texas
- Ex Parte Samuel Richmond Walker, Applicant — Alcala, J., Dissenting