Supreme Court of the United States
Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P. C. v. Wells
April 22, 2003538 U.S. 440
Summary
The Court, in an opinion by Justice Stevens joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, and Thomas, held that common-law control principles govern whether physician-shareholders and directors of a professional corporation count as employees toward the ADA's 15-employee threshold. The Court endorsed six nonexclusive EEOC factors, rejected categorical reliance on corporate form or analogy to partners, and reversed and remanded without conclusively determining the physicians' status. Justice Ginsburg, joined by Justice Breyer, dissented. She would count the physicians as employees and affirm, emphasizing their work for the separate corporate entity, their employment arrangements, and the consequences of excluding ordinary workers from ADA protection.
Holding
- Determining whether shareholder-directors are employees under the ADA.. Common-law agency principles, with control as the principal guidepost, determine whether shareholder-directors are employees. Corporate form, ownership titles, and employment agreements are not independently dispositive; all incidents of the relationship must be considered.
Docket 01-1435
Cited authorities
Cited by
- Dowgiewicz v. Webster, Town of
- Elsa Gulino, Mayling Ralph and Peter Wilds
- Brent Rogers D/b/a, I-Net Spin.com v. the Better Business Bureau of Metropolitan Houston, Inc.
- Carlos Escribano-Reyes, Plaintiff, Appellant v. Professional Hepa Certificate Corp., Defendant, Appellee
- Jones v. Jasper Wyman & Son
- Mansoor Ahmad and Naveed Ahmad v. Yellow Cab Company of New London and Groton, Inc., Connecticut Department Of…
- Tikhonova v. Southeastern Gymnastics
- Fain v. Twin Lakes Regional Sewer District