Supreme Court of the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zandford
June 3, 2002535 U.S. 813
Summary
Justice Stevens delivered the Court’s opinion holding that the SEC sufficiently alleged fraud in connection with securities sales under § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 where a broker sold customers’ securities as part of a scheme to appropriate the proceeds. The securities transactions and deceptive breaches of fiduciary duty coincided; neither a misrepresentation about a security’s value nor an affirmative misrepresentation was necessary. The Court reversed the Fourth Circuit’s judgment directing dismissal and remanded. It did not decide whether the record supported summary judgment for the SEC or whether the District Court properly denied discovery. There were no separate opinions.
Holding
- Whether the SEC alleged the required connection between the broker’s fraud and securities sales.. The complaint sufficiently alleged fraud in connection with securities sales because the broker allegedly sold customers’ securities to further a scheme to appropriate the proceeds, making the securities transactions and deceptive breaches of fiduciary duty coincident.
Docket 01-147
Cited authorities
- 48 Stat. 891
- 18 U.S.C. §1343
- 17 C.F.R. §240
Cited by
- World Surveillance Group Inc. v. La Jolla Cove Investors, Inc.
- In Re Lernout & Hauspie Securities Litigation. Gary B. Filler v. Jo Lernout, Defendants Stonington Partners, Inc. V…
- In Re Lernout & Hauspie Securities Litigation Gary B. Filler v. Jo Lernout, Defendants Stonington Partners, Inc. V…
- Stanley v. Black
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. My Big Coin Pay, Inc.
- United States v. Jesse C. Litvak
- In Re Enron Corporation Securities, Derivative & "ERISA" Litigation, Kevin Lampkin, Janice Schuette, Robert Ferrell…
- Securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff—appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Conrad P. Seghers…