Supreme Court of the United States

Williams v. Taylor

April 18, 2000529 U.S. 420

Summary

Justice Kennedy delivered the unanimous opinion holding that 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(2) restricts federal evidentiary hearings only when the prisoner or counsel lacked diligence, or bore greater fault, in developing the claim’s factual basis in state court. The Court affirmed the denial of a hearing on Williams’s claim concerning an undisclosed psychiatric report because state habeas counsel inadequately investigated known references to the report and Williams conceded he could not satisfy the statute’s additional requirements. It reversed as to the juror-bias and prosecutorial-misconduct claims because counsel had reasonably pursued investigation and had no reason to discover the relationships concealed during voir dire. The Court remanded for further proceedings, leaving the applicable prejudice standard for the lower courts. There were no separate opinions.

Holding

  • The fault requirement in § 2254(e)(2).. The opening clause of § 2254(e)(2) applies only when the prisoner or counsel lacked diligence or bore greater fault in failing to develop the factual basis of a claim in state court.
  • Eligibility for a hearing on the psychiatric-report claim.. Section 2254(e)(2) bars an evidentiary hearing on this claim because counsel was insufficiently diligent and Williams conceded that he could not satisfy § 2254(e)(2)(B).
  • Eligibility for a hearing on the juror-bias and prosecutorial-misconduct claims.. Section 2254(e)(2) does not bar development of these claims in federal court, and the circumstances establish cause for any procedural default in failing to present them to the state courts.

Docket 99-6615

Cited authorities

Cited by