Supreme Court of the United States
Texas v. United States
March 31, 1998523 U.S. 296
Summary
Justice Scalia delivered the unanimous opinion affirming the dismissal of Texas’s declaratory-judgment action as unripe. Texas sought a ruling that appointing masters or management teams to oversee underperforming school districts would not require preclearance under § 5 of the Voting Rights Act. The Court held that any appointments depended on contingent future events, that the legal questions would be better resolved in a concrete application, and that postponing review imposed no substantial hardship on Texas. The Court did not decide whether particular appointments would require preclearance. There were no separate opinions.
Holding
- Ripeness of Texas’s challenge to possible preclearance requirements for school-district sanctions.. The declaratory-judgment action was not ripe because implementation of the sanctions was speculative, the legal issues were not fit for resolution without a concrete application, and delaying review imposed insubstantial hardship.
Docket 97-29
Cited authorities
- 79 Stat. 439
- Tex. Code Ann. §§39.021-39.131
- 28 C.F.R. §51.3
Cited by
- Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. United States Food and Drug Administration
- Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- United States v. State Water Resources Control Board
- (HC) Hand v. Barr
- (HC) Hand v. FCI Herlong
- Liquidia Technologies, Inc. v. United States Food and Drug Administration
- WeWork Companies Inc. v. Weplus (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.
- Project Veritas Action Fund v. Daniel F. Conley