Supreme Court of the United States

Texas v. United States

March 31, 1998523 U.S. 296

Summary

Justice Scalia delivered the unanimous opinion affirming the dismissal of Texas’s declaratory-judgment action as unripe. Texas sought a ruling that appointing masters or management teams to oversee underperforming school districts would not require preclearance under § 5 of the Voting Rights Act. The Court held that any appointments depended on contingent future events, that the legal questions would be better resolved in a concrete application, and that postponing review imposed no substantial hardship on Texas. The Court did not decide whether particular appointments would require preclearance. There were no separate opinions.

Holding

  • Ripeness of Texas’s challenge to possible preclearance requirements for school-district sanctions.. The declaratory-judgment action was not ripe because implementation of the sanctions was speculative, the legal issues were not fit for resolution without a concrete application, and delaying review imposed insubstantial hardship.

Docket 97-29

Cited authorities

Cited by