Supreme Court of the United States

Swidler & Berlin v. United States

June 25, 1998524 U.S. 399

Summary

The Court held that the attorney-client privilege survives a client's death and protects confidential communications from compelled disclosure in a criminal investigation absent an applicable exception. Because the Government did not show that reason and experience justified creating a posthumous criminal-investigation exception or balancing test, the Court reversed the appellate judgment and did not reach work-product protection. Justice O’Connor, dissenting, would have recognized a narrow exception when necessary, otherwise unavailable information would serve an innocent defendant's exoneration or a compelling law-enforcement need.

Holding

  • Whether the attorney-client privilege survives the client's death and bars compelled disclosure of confidential communications in a criminal investigation.. The attorney-client privilege survives the client's death and protects the notes from compelled disclosure in this criminal investigation; the Court declined to create a posthumous criminal exception or apply an ex post balancing test.

Docket 97-1192

Cited authorities

  • 6 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 45
  • Ark. Code Ann. § 16-41-101
  • Neb. Rev. Stat. §27-503
  • Ark. Code Ann. § 16-41-101
  • 74 Iowa L. Rev. 352
  • 71 Yale L.J. 1226