Supreme Court of the United States

United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., Dba Brown Shoe Co.

May 13, 1996517 U.S. 544

Summary

The Court unanimously held, in an opinion by Justice Souter, that the WARN Act authorizes a union to sue for damages on behalf of its employee-members and that Congress constitutionally displaced the third prong of the associational-standing test for those suits. That requirement, concerning the need for individual members' participation, is prudential rather than constitutional and therefore may be removed by statute. The Court reversed the Court of Appeals and remanded. It did not decide whether the union independently had standing based on direct injury or whether a simplified damages claim could satisfy the third prong without congressional authorization. There were no separate opinions.

Holding

  • Whether the WARN Act permits a union to recover damages on behalf of its employee-members.. The WARN Act authorizes a union to sue on behalf of its employee-members for statutory backpay and benefits.
  • Whether Congress may displace the third prong of the associational-standing test.. The third prong is a prudential limitation, not an Article III requirement, and Congress validly displaced it for union suits under the WARN Act.

Docket 95-340

Cited authorities

Cited by