Supreme Court of the United States

Romer v. Evans

May 20, 1996517 U.S. 620

Summary

Justice Kennedy's opinion, joined by Justices Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer, held that Colorado's Amendment 2 violates equal protection and affirmed the Colorado Supreme Court on a different rationale. The amendment imposed a sweeping disability on gay and lesbian persons by withdrawing existing antidiscrimination protections and barring their reinstatement through ordinary governmental action. Its breadth lacked a rational relationship to legitimate state interests and supported an inference of animosity toward the affected class. Justice Scalia, joined by Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justice Thomas, dissented, arguing that the amendment merely denied preferential treatment, rationally preserved traditional sexual morality, and was consistent with Bowers v. Hardwick and historical constitutional practice.

Holding

  • Whether Amendment 2 merely denied special rights.. Amendment 2 imposed a special disability on gay and lesbian persons rather than merely withholding special rights.
  • Whether Amendment 2 satisfied equal protection under rational-basis review.. Amendment 2 violated the Equal Protection Clause because its sweeping status-based classification bore no rational relationship to a legitimate governmental purpose.

Docket 94-1039

Cited authorities

  • S.D. Codified Laws § 20-13-22
  • S.D. Codified Laws § 20-13-23
  • 43 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 955
  • S.D. Codified Laws §§ 20-13-10
  • Iowa Code §§ 216.6-216.8
  • 43 Pa. Cons. Stat. §§ 953
  • N.J. Stat. Ann. §§ 10:5-3
  • N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 354

Cited by