Supreme Court of the United States
O’hare Truck Service, Inc. v. City of Northlake
June 28, 1996518 U.S. 712
Summary
Justice Kennedy’s opinion held that the First Amendment protections against political patronage retaliation extend to independent contractors and regular government service providers. O’Hare stated an actionable claim by alleging that the city removed it from a longstanding towing rotation because its owner refused to contribute to the mayor’s campaign and supported an opponent. Independent-contractor status does not justify withholding protections afforded public employees. The Court reversed and remanded, leaving the lower courts to determine whether the Elrod-Branti political-affiliation rule or Pickering speech balancing governs the claim. The text references a dissent by Justice Scalia but does not supply it or identify its joiners.
Holding
- Whether independent contractors receive First Amendment protection against political-association retaliation.. The protections of Elrod and Branti extend to an independent contractor or regular service provider whose government relationship is terminated in retaliation for exercising rights of political association or expressing political allegiance.
- Whether O’Hare’s allegations state a First Amendment claim.. The complaint states an actionable First Amendment claim because it alleges termination of a longstanding service relationship in retaliation for refusing political support, and respondents offered no justification beyond a claimed right to demand political fealty.
Docket 95-191
Cited authorities
- CA10
- 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cited by
- Perkins Coie LLP v. U.S. Department of Justice
- X-Men Security, Inc. Anthony Richards
- Dean Kinney David Hall v. Bobby Weaver
- Dean Kinney David Hall v. Bobby Weaver
- Robert Lloyd v. Lisa Birkman, Cynthia Long, Valerie Covey, and Ron Morrison
- Bernice Garza v. Omar Escobar Jr.
- Barbara Burge v. Pearl River County, Mississippi, David Earl Johnson
- Dean Kinney; David Hall, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Bobby Weaver