Supreme Court of the United States
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Lundy
January 17, 1996516 U.S. 235
Summary
The Court, in an opinion by Justice O'Connor, held that the two-year look-back period under 26 U. S. C. § 6512(b)(3)(B) applies when a taxpayer has not filed a return before the Commissioner mails a notice of deficiency. Because Lundy's withheld taxes were deemed paid more than two years before that notice, the Tax Court lacked jurisdiction to award a refund, and the Court reversed the Fourth Circuit. A refund claim actually filed after the deficiency notice does not change the applicable look-back period. Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Stevens, dissented, reasoning that the statute permits consideration of actual refund claims and should not deny a refund available in district court. Justice Stevens also wrote separately to emphasize that the majority's interpretation converted a taxpayer-protective provision into a handicap.
Holding
- The applicable look-back period when no return has been filed before the deficiency notice.. The two-year look-back period applies, and the Tax Court cannot refund taxes paid more than two years before the notice of deficiency was mailed.
- The effect of a refund claim actually filed after the deficiency notice.. A subsequently filed return and refund claim do not determine the look-back period under § 6512(b)(3)(B).
Docket 94-1785
Cited authorities
- Rev. Rul. 76-511
- Rev. Rul. 76-511
- Rev. Rul. 76-511
- Revenue Ruling 76-511
- Rev. Rul. 76-511
- Revenue Ruling 76-511
- Rev. Rul. 76-511
- Revenue Ruling 76-511
Cited by
- Robert E. Wadlow and Connie v. Wadlow v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Estate of Frank A. Branson, Mary M. March v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Llwellyn Greene-Thapedi v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- Llwellyn Greene-Thapedi v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
- United States of America, Appellee v. Jose Jimenez, Defendant, Appellant
- United States of America, Appellee v. Yeifrin Rafael Ozuna-Cabrera, A/k/a Jeffrey Ozuna, A/k/a Howard Edward Bond…
- United States of America, Appellant v. Nippon Paper Industries Co., Ltd., Defendants, Appellees
- United States v. Nippon Paper