Supreme Court of the United States
Parr v. United States
June 11, 1956351 U.S. 513
Summary
The Court affirmed the dismissal of Parr's appeal from the dismissal of his original tax-evasion indictment after the Government obtained another indictment elsewhere. Viewed separately, the original prosecution ended in Parr's favor, leaving him without an injury supporting appeal; viewed together with the new prosecution, the dismissal was interlocutory and reviewable after conviction. The collateral-order exception did not apply. The Court also denied leave to seek original writs of mandamus and prohibition and did not decide whether the Government could circumvent the transfer order by obtaining a new indictment. Chief Justice Warren dissented, joined by Justices Black, Douglas, and Clark, arguing that the dismissal was final, that Parr was aggrieved, and that the Government could not evade the transfer order in this manner.
Holding
- Standing to appeal the dismissal considered as the termination of a separate prosecution.. Parr could not appeal because termination of that prosecution in his favor did not aggrieve him.
- Finality when the two indictments were considered parts of a single prosecution.. The dismissal was an interlocutory step rather than an appealable final decision.
- Application of the collateral-order exception.. The dismissal did not fall within the exception permitting immediate review of certain collateral orders.
- Availability of original writs of mandamus and prohibition.. Leave to file the petition for extraordinary writs was denied.
Docket 320
Cited authorities
- Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Rule 21
- 28 U.S.C. § 1651
- 28 U.S.C. § 1291
- 53 Stat. 62
- 18 U.S.C. § 3237
Cited by
- In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation Steering Committee v. Mead Corporation, Defendants-Appellants in Re…
- McDermott International, Inc. v. Lloyds Underwriters of London, John Richard Ludbrooke Youell as Rep of Those…
- Charles G. Black v. the Honorable Marion S. Boyd…
- The First National Bank in Dodge City, Dodge City, Kansas v. the Johnson County National Bank and Trust Company, of…
- In Re Daniel Ellsberg, Petitioner
- In Re Puerto RICO Electric Power Authority, Petitioner
- United States of America, Appellee v. Brian A. Moller-Butcher, Defendants, Appellees. M.e.s. Equipment…
- In Re Bushkin Associates, Inc., and Merle J. Bushkin, Petitioners