Supreme Court of the United States

Mesarosh, Alias Nelson v. United States

November 5, 1956352 U.S. 1

Summary

Chief Justice Warren's opinion held that the Government's disclosures wholly discredited its paid informer's credibility and tainted the convictions of all petitioners, requiring reversal and a new trial under the Court's supervisory authority over federal criminal proceedings. The Court distinguished an ordinary defense motion based on newly discovered impeachment evidence and rejected a preliminary remand to assess the witness's credibility or the sufficiency of the remaining evidence. Justice Harlan, joined by Justices Frankfurter and Burton, dissented, arguing that the District Court should first investigate the disputed facts and assess their effect on each conviction. In an earlier dissent also reproduced here, Justice Frankfurter would have granted the Government's motion for a hearing immediately rather than scheduling argument on it. Justice Brennan did not participate.

Holding

  • Whether the Government's disclosures required a new trial for all petitioners.. The disclosures wholly discredited the informer's credibility and tainted the trial as to every petitioner, requiring a new trial.
  • Whether a preliminary District Court hearing was the appropriate remedy.. A remand merely to investigate credibility or evaluate the remaining evidence would be futile; the petitioners were entitled directly to a new trial.

Docket 20

Cited authorities

  • Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
  • 18 U.S.C. § 371
  • 54 Stat. 670
  • 18 U.S.C. §§ 2385

Cited by