Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock

Summary

The Court held that Congress's plenary authority over Indian tribal relations and tribal property was not materially limited by the treaty's requirement that three-fourths of the adult male Indians approve a cession. Because Congress could alter or abrogate the treaty and dispose of the tribal lands, the courts could not review alleged defects in the tribal agreement or inquire into Congress's motives. The Court therefore upheld the challenged legislation and affirmed dismissal of the bill.