Oklahoma lawAttorney FeesAccounting

Security Deposit Return in Oklahoma

September 27, 2026 · LawDiver Research Team

Start with Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 115. In Oklahoma, The cap is No statewide cap. The return deadline is 45 days after termination of the tenancy / surrender of possession, with an itemized list of deductions. Interest: No statewide interest requirement. That is the question this guide answers for getting a security deposit back. Wrongful withholding can support damages of twice the amount wrongfully withheld plus attorney fees in bad-faith cases.

Deposit limits in Oklahoma

No statewide cap

When the deposit must be returned

45 days after termination of the tenancy / surrender of possession, with an itemized list of deductions

How the Oklahoma rule applies

Apply the Oklahoma authorities in order. The facts are simplified so the statute and the standard are visible.

A residential tenant moves out of a Oklahoma rental and the landlord has not returned the deposit.

Check the cap that applied when the deposit was collected: No statewide cap.
Calendar the return deadline: 45 days after termination of the tenancy / surrender of possession, with an itemized list of deductions
Interest, if any: No statewide interest requirement.
If the landlord keeps money without the required accounting: Wrongful withholding can support damages of twice the amount wrongfully withheld plus attorney fees in bad-faith cases.

Oklahoma does not cap residential deposits statewide. Landlords must return deposits with itemization within 45 days. Small claims is the usual remedy for wrongful withholding.

Interest and accounting

No statewide interest requirement.

Penalties for wrongful withholding

Wrongful withholding can support damages of twice the amount wrongfully withheld plus attorney fees in bad-faith cases.

Practical process for tenants and landlords

Oklahoma does not cap residential deposits statewide. Landlords must return deposits with itemization within 45 days. Small claims is the usual remedy for wrongful withholding.

Document the unit with dated photos or video at move-in and move-out, keep the lease and any inspection checklist, and send a dated written demand if the deadline passes without a lawful accounting.

Case law: security deposits in Oklahoma

Clifford v. United States F. & G. Co.

Clifford v. United States F. & G. Co., 119 Okla. 133 (1926)

…it might suffer by reason of its having executed a certain depository ■bond for the Oklahoma Siate Bank Gf Jennings, Ok'la. The record discloses that on June 22, 1921, the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, as surety, and the Oklahoma State Bank of Jennings, as principal, executed and delivered to the board of county commissioners of Pawnee county its depository bond i…

On security deposits, Clifford v. United States F. & G. Co. speaks to the Oklahoma dispute in this passage: "it might suffer by reason of its having executed a certain depository ■bond for the Oklahoma Siate Bank Gf Jennings, Ok'la. The record discloses that on June 22, 1921, the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, as surety, and the Oklahoma State Bank of Jennings, as principal," The surrounding opinion shows how the court applied that language to the record.

DODDER Et Al. v. MOBERLY

DODDER Et Al. v. MOBERLY, 28 Okla. 334 (1911)

…heriff nor the plaintiffs have not paid said mortgages, nor deposited the amount due thereon with the county treasurer, as required by law.” —and that the attached propery was exempt, as shown by affidavits thereto attached. On February 3, 1908, an order of sale issued, the property was sold, and the proceeds, $247.35, lodged in the registry of the court. . On March 3, 1908, Ge…

On security deposits, DODDER Et Al. v. MOBERLY speaks to the Oklahoma dispute in this passage: "On February 3, 1908, an order of sale issued, the property was sold, and the proceeds, $247.35, lodged in the registry of the court. ." The surrounding opinion shows how the court applied that language to the record.

Miller v. Thompson

Miller v. Thompson, 69 Okla. 264 (1917)

…that Mr. Wills had signed a bond for $50,-000 to secure the deposits by Creek county in the Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank, that he was satisfied the bank was in a failing condition, and that he wanted security on these notes; that the cross-petitioner, Thomas Wills, at the time stated that he would prefer to give to the plaintiff a deed for the property upon which the plaintiff he…

On security deposits, Miller v. Thompson speaks to the Oklahoma dispute in this passage: "that Mr. Wills had signed a bond for $50,-000 to secure the deposits by Creek county in the Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank, that he was satisfied the bank was in a failing condition, and that he wanted security on these notes; that the cross-petitioner, Thomas Wills, at the time stat" The surrounding opinion shows how the court applied that language to the record.

ISELIN v. FARROW Et Al.

ISELIN v. FARROW Et Al., 115 Okla. 218 (1925)

…hat the money received from the sale of the wheat should be deposited in the defendant bank, and there held until they could determine which of the mortgagees held the prior lien, and that same should be paid to whoever was entitled to same by reason of holding the senior or prior lien. It was also agreed that the defendant Farrow might draw cheeks on the deposit in small amoun…

ISELIN v. FARROW Et Al. is worth reading on Oklahoma security deposits because the court put the point in its own words: "hat the money received from the sale of the wheat should be deposited in the defendant bank, and there held until they could determine which of the mortgagees held the prior lien, and that same should be paid to whoever was entitled to same by reason of holding the senior or prio" Use that passage as the starting point, then read the facts that precede it.

Representative Cleta Deatherage

Representative Cleta Deatherage (1980)

…f The Residential Landlord Tenant Act relates to damage and security deposits and provides as follows: "A. Any damage or security deposit required by a landlord of a tenant must be kept in an escrow account for the tenant which account shall be maintained with a federally insured financial institution. Misappropriation of the security deposit shall be unlawful and punishable by…

Representative Cleta Deatherage is worth reading on Oklahoma security deposits because the court put the point in its own words: "The Residential Landlord Tenant Act relates to damage and security deposits and provides as follows: 'A." Use that passage as the starting point, then read the facts that precede it.

Senator Stratton Taylor Part I

Senator Stratton Taylor Part I (1991)

…ICH YOU ASK, IN EFFECT: DOES 41 O.S. 115(B), WHICH ALLOWS A SECURITY DEPOSIT TO REVERT TO THE LANDLORD IF THE TENANT DOES NOT MAKE A WRITTEN DEMAND FOR ITS RETURN WITHIN SIX MONTHS AFTER TERMINATION OF THE TENANCY, VIOLATE THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION OR ARTICLE II, SECTION 7 OF THE OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION? BECAUSE THERE MAY…

Oklahoma opinions such as Senator Stratton Taylor Part I are cited where security deposits is disputed. The court stated: "REVERT TO THE LANDLORD IF THE TENANT DOES NOT MAKE A WRITTEN DEMAND FOR ITS RETURN WITHIN SIX MONTHS AFTER TERMINATION OF THE TENANCY, VIOLATE THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION OR ARTICLE II, SECTION 7 OF THE OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION?" That is the language to brief; the rest of the decision supplies the procedural posture.

SHROPSHIRE v. PARSONS

SHROPSHIRE v. PARSONS, 489 P.3d 536 (2021)

…f $2,519.52 for back rent and damages in excess of Tenant's security deposit. The Counterclaim or Setoff states that it was "duly sworn" by Landlord's counsel, and is signed, but not notarized. ¶4 The parties appeared for hearing on January 16, 2020. Tenant objected to Landlord's Counterclaim or Setoff because it was not verified. The trial court overruled Tenant's objection, a…

Oklahoma opinions such as SHROPSHIRE v. PARSONS are cited where security deposits is disputed. The court stated: "Tenant's security deposit. The Counterclaim or Setoff states that it was 'duly sworn' by Landlord's counsel, and is signed, but not notarized. ¶4 The parties appeared for hearing on January 16, 2020. Tenant objected to Landlord's Counterclaim or Setoff because it was not verified." That is the language to brief; the rest of the decision supplies the procedural posture.

Key takeaways

Maximum deposit: No statewide cap
Return deadline: 45 days after termination of the tenancy / surrender of possession, with an itemized list of deductions
Interest: No statewide interest requirement.
Penalties: Wrongful withholding can support damages of twice the amount wrongfully withheld plus attorney fees in bad-faith cases.
Primary authority: Okla. Stat. tit. 41, § 115.

Frequently asked questions

How much can a landlord charge for a security deposit in Oklahoma?