New Mexico lawEvictionLandlord TenantRestitution

How Does Eviction Work in New Mexico?

September 22, 2026 · LawDiver Research Team

If you only remember one point about how eviction works in New Mexico, remember this: New Mexico requires Owner-resident / petition for restitution (eviction) in Magistrate court or metropolitan court (as applicable) for residential restitution actions.. Three-day and seven-day notices (and other statutory periods) for nonpayment, substantial violations, and holdover must track UORRA requirements. Procedure, examples, and the opinions below hang off N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 47-8-1 et seq. (Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act). After notice expires, owner files a petition for restitution; hearing follows; writ of restitution may issue for sheriff execution.

Where the case is filed

Eviction actions in New Mexico are filed in Magistrate court or metropolitan court (as applicable) for residential restitution actions.. Service must follow New Mexico rules — personal service, substitute service, or posting/mailing combinations as authorized. Improper service can void a default judgment.

Walking through New Mexico facts

Use this walkthrough to see which New Mexico authority does the work at each step.

A residential landlord in New Mexico wants possession after unpaid rent and cannot use a lockout.

  1. Give the notice New Mexico actually requires: Three-day and seven-day notices (and other statutory periods) for nonpayment, substantial violations, and holdover must track UORRA requirements.
  2. File Owner-resident / petition for restitution (eviction) in Magistrate court or metropolitan court (as applicable) for residential restitution actions. under N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 47-8-1 et seq. (Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act).
  3. Prove the tenancy, the ground, and proper notice. Tenant defenses include: Improper notice, habitability, retaliatory eviction, payment/tender, and procedural defects under UORRA.
  4. If the landlord prevails, possession is enforced by writ — Self-help eviction of residential tenants is prohibited; judicial writ of restitution is required.

After notice expires, owner files a petition for restitution; hearing follows; writ of restitution may issue for sheriff execution.

Hearing, judgment, and writ of possession

After service, the tenant usually has a short window to answer. At hearing the landlord must prove the landlord-tenant relationship, the ground for eviction, proper notice, and (for nonpayment) the rent due. If the landlord prevails, the court issues a judgment for possession and, after any statutory waiting period, a writ of possession executed by the sheriff or constable — not by the landlord personally.

Tenant defenses in New Mexico

Improper notice, habitability, retaliatory eviction, payment/tender, and procedural defects under UORRA.

Habitability, retaliation, and discrimination defenses can convert a simple nonpayment case into a longer civil action. Tenants asserting habitability should document repair requests; landlords facing those defenses should document inspections and cure efforts.

Self-help is not a shortcut

Self-help eviction of residential tenants is prohibited; judicial writ of restitution is required.

Illegal lockouts can expose landlords to statutory damages, attorney's fees, and even criminal penalties in some jurisdictions. The lawful path is notice → Owner-resident / petition for restitution (eviction) → writ.

Practical tips

  • Calendar every notice and answer deadline; eviction timelines are intentionally short.
  • Bring the lease, ledger, notices, and proof of service to the first hearing.
  • Search New Mexico opinions for “Owner-resident / petition for restitution (eviction)”, “writ of possession”, and “notice to quit” on LawDiver before a contested trial.
  • Subsidized, mobile-home, and hotel-to-housing arrangements may follow different notice statutes — verify the housing type.

Case law: eviction and landlord-tenant in New Mexico

(The Way It Was, Inc.) T.W.I.W., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven J. RHUDY, Defendant-Appellant

(The Way It Was, Inc.) T.W.I.W., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven J. RHUDY, Defendant-Appellant, 96 N.M. 354 (1981)

…fax County by appellee, The Way It Was, Inc. (T.W.I.W.) for unlawful detainer and nonpayment of rent and gas utility expenses on a rental unit located in Eagle Nest, New Mexico. The. court found for T.W.I.W. in the amount of $1,148.72, plus costs, for back rent and a utility bill. Appellant (Rhudy) appeals. We affirm in part and reverse in part. The premises were rented to Rhud…

(The Way It Was, Inc.) T.W.I.W., INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven J. RHUDY, Defendant-Appellant is worth reading on New Mexico eviction / landlord-tenant because the court put the point in its own words: "County by appellee, The Way It Was, Inc. (T.W.I.W.) for unlawful detainer and nonpayment of rent and gas utility expenses on a rental unit located in Eagle Nest, New Mexico. The. court found for T.W.I.W. in the amount of $1,148.72, plus costs, for back rent and a utility bill." Use that passage as the starting point, then read the facts that precede it.

McCarthy v. Kay.

McCarthy v. Kay., 52 N.M. 5 (1947)

…sue in the ejectment suit. In Utah their forcible entry and unlawful detainer statute allows the recovery of rent in the summary judgment on behalf of the plaintiff for rent accruing subsequent to the unlawful detainer. One suit was filed for the unpaid rent and another for the unlawful detainer. Judgment was first rendered finding the defendant guilty of unlawful detainer and…

New Mexico opinions such as McCarthy v. Kay. are cited where eviction / landlord-tenant is disputed. The court stated: "In Utah their forcible entry and unlawful detainer statute allows the recovery of rent in the summary judgment on behalf of the plaintiff for rent accruing subsequent to the unlawful detainer. One suit was filed for the unpaid rent and another for the unlawful detainer." That is the language to brief; the rest of the decision supplies the procedural posture.

STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph M. ASHLEY, Defendant-Appellant

STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph M. ASHLEY, Defendant-Appellant, 108 N.M. 343 (1989)

…1978, §§ 35-10-1 to -6 (Repl. Pamp.1988) (forcible entry or unlawful detainer statute). Although we have found no New Mexico holding that adopts the doctrine stated in the Restatement, supra, Section 14.2(1), the following dictum is strongly suggestive: The purpose of the [forcible entry and unlawful detainer] statute is, regardless of the actual condition of the title to the p…

STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph M. ASHLEY, Defendant-Appellant is worth reading on New Mexico eviction / landlord-tenant because the court put the point in its own words: "Repl. Pamp.1988) (forcible entry or unlawful detainer statute). Although we have found no New Mexico holding that adopts the doctrine stated in the Restatement, supra, Section 14." Use that passage as the starting point, then read the facts that precede it.

First Nat. Bank in Albuquerque v. Tanney.

First Nat. Bank in Albuquerque v. Tanney., 51 N.M. 60 (1947)

…low, seeks the reversal of a judgment finding him guilty of unlawful detainer, claiming the evidence was insufficient to support the findings of fact made by the trial court. The findings were that the appellee was the owner of an office building in which the appellant was a tenant from month to month, and that he refused to vacate the premises after a statutory notice to do so…

First Nat. Bank in Albuquerque v. Tanney. is worth reading on New Mexico eviction / landlord-tenant because the court put the point in its own words: "low, seeks the reversal of a judgment finding him guilty of unlawful detainer, claiming the evidence was insufficient to support the findings of fact made by the trial court. The findings were that the appellee was the owner of an office building in which the appellant was a tena" Use that passage as the starting point, then read the facts that precede it.

Richard G. KASSEL and G. Leone Kassel, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. William A. ANDERSON and Judith C. Anderson

Richard G. KASSEL and G. Leone Kassel, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. William A. ANDERSON and Judith C. Anderson, 84 N.M. 697 (1973)

OPINION WOOD, Chief Judge. The appeal concerns unlawful detainer. Sections 36-12-1 through 36-12-4, N.M.S. A. 1953 (2nd Repl.Vol. 6). The issues concern: (1) summary judgment and (2) refusal to consolidate the unlawful detainer action with another cause. Summary judgment. The action for unlawful detainer is purely statutory and is restricted in its operation to the…

New Mexico opinions such as Richard G. KASSEL and G. Leone Kassel, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. William A. ANDERSON and Judith C. Anderson are cited where eviction / landlord-tenant is disputed. The court stated: "OPINION WOOD, Chief Judge. The appeal concerns unlawful detainer. Sections 36-12-1 through 36-12-4, N.M.S. A. 1953 (2nd Repl.Vol. 6). The issues concern: (1) summary judgment and (2) refusal to consolidate the unlawful detainer action with another cause. Summary judgment." That is the language to brief; the rest of the decision supplies the procedural posture.

WAL-GO ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Reyes LEON and Catherine Leon, His Wife, Defendants-Appellees

WAL-GO ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Reyes LEON and Catherine Leon, His Wife, Defendants-Appellees, 95 N.M. 565 (1981)

…the Magistrate Court of Otero County for forcible entry and unlawful detainer, sections 35-10-1 to 35-10-6, N.M.S.A.1978 (F.E. U.D. statutes), to regain possession of premises leased to appellees (lessees). The magistrate court found for lessees. Lessor appealed to the district court. On de novo review, the district court also found for lessees. Lessor appeals. We affirm. In Ju…

On eviction / landlord-tenant, WAL-GO ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Reyes LEON and Catherine Leon, His Wife, Defendants-Appellees speaks to the New Mexico dispute in this passage: "Magistrate Court of Otero County for forcible entry and unlawful detainer, sections 35-10-1 to 35-10-6, N.M.S.A.1978 (F.E. U.D. statutes), to regain possession of premises leased to appellees (lessees). The magistrate court found for lessees. Lessor appealed to the district court." The surrounding opinion shows how the court applied that language to the record.

Eva DENNISON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steve MARLOWE and Patty Marlowe, His Wife, D/B/A Great American Saloon

Eva DENNISON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steve MARLOWE and Patty Marlowe, His Wife, D/B/A Great American Saloon, 106 N.M. 433 (1987)

…Dennison (lessor) filed a complaint for forcible entry and unlawful detainer of real property against Steve and Patty Marlowe (lessees), husband and wife. Lessor prayed for restoration of the premises and damages for unpaid rental. Lessees filed a counterclaim seeking, inter alia, to have lessor remedy certain safety code violations in the leased building, damages for remodeli…

On eviction / landlord-tenant, Eva DENNISON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steve MARLOWE and Patty Marlowe, His Wife, D/B/A Great American Saloon speaks to the New Mexico dispute in this passage: "Dennison (lessor) filed a complaint for forcible entry and unlawful detainer of real property against Steve and Patty Marlowe (lessees), husband and wife. Lessor prayed for restoration of the premises and damages for unpaid rental." The surrounding opinion shows how the court applied that language to the record.

Key takeaways

  • Process name: Owner-resident / petition for restitution (eviction).
  • Primary authority: N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 47-8-1 et seq. (Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act).
  • Filing forum: Magistrate court or metropolitan court (as applicable) for residential restitution actions..
  • Notice: Three-day and seven-day notices (and other statutory periods) for nonpayment, substantial violations, and holdover must track UORRA requirements.
  • Self-help lockouts: Self-help eviction of residential tenants is prohibited; judicial writ of restitution is required.

The New Mexico eviction / Owner-resident / petition for restitution (eviction) framework

After notice expires, owner files a petition for restitution; hearing follows; writ of restitution may issue for sheriff execution.

Exact deadlines vary by county practice, service method, and whether the tenant answers. Commercial leases and subsidized housing can add federal or program-specific rules on top of New Mexico law.

Notice requirements before filing

Three-day and seven-day notices (and other statutory periods) for nonpayment, substantial violations, and holdover must track UORRA requirements.

A defective notice is one of the most common reasons an eviction is dismissed without prejudice. Landlords should match the notice form and timing to the ground for eviction (nonpayment vs. cureable breach vs. no-cause termination where allowed). Tenants should keep the envelope, text, email, and posting photos.

Frequently asked questions

How does eviction work in New Mexico?

New Mexico uses Owner-resident / petition for restitution (eviction) under N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 47-8-1 et seq. (Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act). After notice expires, owner files a petition for restitution; hearing follows; writ of restitution may issue for sheriff execution.

How much notice does a landlord have to give?

Three-day and seven-day notices (and other statutory periods) for nonpayment, substantial violations, and holdover must track UORRA requirements.

Can a landlord change the locks without going to court?

Self-help eviction of residential tenants is prohibited; judicial writ of restitution is required.

What defenses can a tenant raise?

Improper notice, habitability, retaliatory eviction, payment/tender, and procedural defects under UORRA.

New Mexico Eviction Process Guide (2026) | LawDiver