BAC limits: 0.08% for adults; 0.04% for commercial drivers; zero-tolerance for drivers under 21. A first offense: First-offense driving under the influence is typically a misdemeanor with fines, possible jail, license suspension, alcohol program, and ignition-interlock conditions. Felony threshold: A subsequent OWI within a defined period, or OWI causing serious injury/death, can be a felony. That is what separates District of Columbia DUI penalties from a generic national summary. Read D.C. Code §§ 50-2206.11 to 50-2206.16 before the background sections below. Lookback: Prior OWI/DUI convictions within 15 years enhance penalties under District impaired-driving statutes.. Ignition interlock: Ignition interlock may be required for license reinstatement after OWI.
Lookback window for prior offenses
Prior OWI/DUI convictions within 15 years enhance penalties under District impaired-driving statutes.
First-offense penalties
First-offense driving under the influence is typically a misdemeanor with fines, possible jail, license suspension, alcohol program, and ignition-interlock conditions.
When a District of Columbia DUI becomes a felony
A subsequent OWI within a defined period, or OWI causing serious injury/death, can be a felony.
A concrete District of Columbia scenario
Here is one way the District of Columbia pieces fit together. Change any fact and the statute may point somewhere else.
A driver in District of Columbia is charged with a first impaired-driving offense and wants to know what the statute actually sets.
- Start with the alcohol limits: 0.08% for adults; 0.04% for commercial drivers; zero-tolerance for drivers under 21
- Read the first-offense range: First-offense driving under the influence is typically a misdemeanor with fines, possible jail, license suspension, alcohol program, and ignition-interlock conditions.
- Ask when the charge becomes a felony: A subsequent OWI within a defined period, or OWI causing serious injury/death, can be a felony. Lookback: Prior OWI/DUI convictions within 15 years enhance penalties under District impaired-driving statutes.
- Interlock: Ignition interlock may be required for license reinstatement after OWI.
District OWI prosecutions under D.C. Code § 50-2206.11 proceed in Superior Court with parallel DMV administrative actions. Defense reviews the stop and breath/blood foundations.
Ignition interlock and license consequences
Ignition interlock may be required for license reinstatement after OWI.
How a typical District of Columbia DUI case unfolds
District OWI prosecutions under D.C. Code § 50-2206.11 proceed in Superior Court with parallel DMV administrative actions. Defense reviews the stop and breath/blood foundations.
Related District of Columbia guides
- How to file for divorce in District of Columbia
- Child custody and parenting time in District of Columbia
- Security deposit return in District of Columbia
Case law: DUI penalties in District of Columbia
Cynthia HARRIS, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee
Cynthia HARRIS, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee, 1991 D.C. App. LEXIS 340 (1991)
…ant Cynthia Harris was convicted following a bench trial of driving under the influence of a drug in violation of D.C.Code § 40-716(b)(l) (1990 Repl.).1 Harris appeals on two grounds: (1) that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence lay opinion as to whether she was under the influence of a drug; and (2) that there was insufficient evidence to support her conviction in…
On DUI penalties, Cynthia HARRIS, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee speaks to the District of Columbia dispute in this passage: "Cynthia Harris was convicted following a bench trial of driving under the influence of a drug in violation of D.C.Code § 40-716(b)(l) (1990 Repl.)." The surrounding opinion shows how the court applied that language to the record.
Tracy I. TABAKA, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee
Tracy I. TABAKA, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee, 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 255 (2009)
PER CURIAM: A jury found appellant guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), operating a vehicle while impaired by alcohol (OWI), and operating a motor vehicle without an operator’s permit. The District government concedes that, if appellant’s conviction for DUI is upheld, her conviction for OWI must be vacated on remand as duplicative. We accept th…
On DUI penalties, Tracy I. TABAKA, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee speaks to the District of Columbia dispute in this passage: "PER CURIAM: A jury found appellant guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), operating a vehicle while impaired by alcohol (OWI), and operating a motor vehicle without an operator’s permit." The surrounding opinion shows how the court applied that language to the record.
Krishna Patrick MUIR, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee
Krishna Patrick MUIR, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee, 2016 D.C. App. LEXIS 1 (2016)
…nt Krishna Patrick Muir went to trial in 2011 on charges of driving under the influence (“DUI”) and operating a vehicle while impaired (“OWI”). The trial judge instructed the'jury that it' could convict Muir of OWI if it found-his consumption of alcohol had impaired- his ability to operate a motor vehicle “in any way,” while it would have to find “an appreciable degree” of impa…
On DUI penalties, Krishna Patrick MUIR, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee speaks to the District of Columbia dispute in this passage: "Krishna Patrick Muir went to trial in 2011 on charges of driving under the influence (“DUI”) and operating a vehicle while impaired (“OWI”)." The surrounding opinion shows how the court applied that language to the record.
Tony Alonzo STEVENSON, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee
Tony Alonzo STEVENSON, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee, 1989 D.C. App. LEXIS 165 (1989)
…pairment of driving ability is an element of the offense of driving under the influence of alcohol. Miller v. District of Columbia, 517 A.2d 1068 (D.C.1986); see Washington v. District of Columbia, 538 A.2d 1151, 1156 (D.C.1988) (noting that evidence of impairment is unnecessary for conviction for the “per se” offense of driving with .10 percent or more blood alcohol content, a…
On DUI penalties, Tony Alonzo STEVENSON, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee speaks to the District of Columbia dispute in this passage: "Miller v. District of Columbia, 517 A.2d 1068 (D.C.1986); see Washington v. District of Columbia, 538 A.2d 1151, 1156 (D.C.1988) (noting that evidence of impairment is unnecessary for conviction for the “per se” offense of driving with ." The surrounding opinion shows how the court applied that language to the record.
Charles W. WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee
Charles W. WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee, 1988 D.C. App. LEXIS 21 (1988)
…hat he thought he would not have found appellant guilty of "driving under the influence” on the basis of the evidence presented. The government, it should be noted, did not attempt to prove appellant guilty of driving while "under the influence" or "impaired” by adducing evidence other than test results relevant to those conditions, nor was appellant charged with driving while…
On DUI penalties, Charles W. WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee speaks to the District of Columbia dispute in this passage: "hat he thought he would not have found appellant guilty of 'driving under the influence” on the basis of the evidence presented. The government, it should be noted, did not attempt to prove appellant guilty of driving while 'under the influence' or 'impaired” by adducing evidence" The surrounding opinion shows how the court applied that language to the record.
Larry R. TAYLOR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Larry R. TAYLOR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 2012 D.C. App. LEXIS 337 (2012)
…le, however, to reach a verdict on the additional charge of Driving Under the Influence (“DUI”).2 In this appeal, appellant argues that OWI and DUI are “alternative offenses for the same conduct,” and that the trial judge therefore committed reversible error (1) in instructing the jury that OWI “is a lesser standard,” and (2) in failing to instruct them that, to convict appella…
On DUI penalties, Larry R. TAYLOR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA speaks to the District of Columbia dispute in this passage: "le, however, to reach a verdict on the additional charge of Driving Under the Influence (“DUI”).2 In this appeal, appellant argues that OWI and DUI are “alternative offenses for the same conduct,” and that the trial judge therefore committed reversible error (1) in instructing th" The surrounding opinion shows how the court applied that language to the record.
Nathaniel RANSFORD, Calvin Fox, Michael Alexander, Ronald D. Williams, Appellants, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee
…person’s blood necessary to establish prima facie proof of driving under the influence from .15 to .10 percent, but preserved the language from the earlier law concerning “competent proof” of a driver’s blood alcohol content “at the time” he was driving. Pub.L. No. 92-519, § 8, D.C.Code § 40-609a(2) and (3) (1973 ed.). The purpose of the law was “to promote safe driving and el…
District of Columbia opinions such as Nathaniel RANSFORD, Calvin Fox, Michael Alexander, Ronald D. Williams, Appellants, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee are cited where DUI penalties is disputed. The court stated: "Pub.L. No. 92-519, § 8, D.C.Code § 40-609a(2) and (3) (1973 ed.)." That is the language to brief; the rest of the decision supplies the procedural posture.
Key takeaways
- BAC limits: 0.08% for adults; 0.04% for commercial drivers; zero-tolerance for drivers under 21
- Lookback period: Prior OWI/DUI convictions within 15 years enhance penalties under District impaired-driving statutes.
- First-offense range: First-offense driving under the influence is typically a misdemeanor with fines, possible jail, license suspension, alcohol program, and ignition-interlock conditions.
- Felony threshold: A subsequent OWI within a defined period, or OWI causing serious injury/death, can be a felony.
- Ignition interlock: Ignition interlock may be required for license reinstatement after OWI.
- Primary authority: D.C. Code §§ 50-2206.11 to 50-2206.16.
Blood alcohol limits in District of Columbia
0.08% for adults; 0.04% for commercial drivers; zero-tolerance for drivers under 21
Frequently asked questions
What is the legal BAC limit in District of Columbia?
0.08% for adults; 0.04% for commercial drivers; zero-tolerance for drivers under 21
Is a first DUI a felony in District of Columbia?
A subsequent OWI within a defined period, or OWI causing serious injury/death, can be a felony.
Will I need an ignition interlock device?
Ignition interlock may be required for license reinstatement after OWI.
This guide covers District of Columbia impaired-driving law as of 2026. Sentencing grids, administrative DMV rules, and local diversion programs change — verify the live statute and speak with counsel about your charging document.