Washington Supreme Court
State v. Griffin
January 5, 2012268 P.3d 924
Summary
The Washington Supreme Court held that a fact‑finding hearing under RCW 9.94A.537 is not exempt from the Washington Rules of Evidence, so the hearsay testimony used to find the rapid‑recidivism aggravating circumstance was inadmissible; the Court reversed the Court of Appeals, vacated Griffin's exceptional sentence, and remanded for resentencing with the evidence rules applied.
Holding
- Whether a fact‑finding hearing under RCW 9.94A.537 is exempt from the Washington Rules of Evidence under ER 1101(c)(3).. The Court held that RCW 9.94A.537 creates a special category of sentencing in which the Washington Rules of Evidence do apply; therefore the hearing is not exempt.
Docket 84554-9
Cited by
- The State of Washington v. Nakia Lee Otton
- The State of Washington v. William John Kipp, Jr.
- State of Washington v. Samuel Troy Burris
- State of Washington v. Jesse Lee Criswell
- State of Washington v. William Alvarez-calo
- State of Washington, Resp. v. Andre L. Perez, App.
- State of Washington v. William Charles Womack
- State of Washington v. D.s.