Supreme Court of Virginia

Shipe v. Hunter

September 16, 2010280 Va. 480

Summary

The Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed the circuit court’s dismissal because the complaint was not signed by a Virginia‑licensed attorney or the pro se plaintiff, and because the missing signature defect could not be cured by amendment. The Court also held that a Virginia lawyer may not delegate his signature to an out‑of‑state lawyer.

Holding

  • Whether a Virginia lawyer may validly authorize an out‑of‑state lawyer to sign the Virginia lawyer’s name on a pleading filed in Virginia.. A Virginia lawyer may not delegate his signature to an out‑of‑state lawyer; a pleading signed only by a person not licensed to practice law in Virginia is a nullity.
  • Whether the defect of a missing Virginia‑licensed attorney signature can be cured by amendment under the relation‑back provisions of Code §§ 8.01‑6 through ‑6.2.. The missing signature cannot be cured by amendment because supplying a missing signature is not one of the three relation‑back situations authorized by Code §§ 8.01‑6 through ‑6.2.

Docket 091738

Cited authorities

  • Rule 3.1

Cited by