Utah Supreme Court

Rachel Graves and Dustin Russell, a Married Couple

January 30, 20152015 Utah LEXIS 55

Summary

The Utah Supreme Court held that North Eastern Services owed a duty of care to the minor victim based on a special relationship under Restatement (Second) of Torts §317, affirmed that expert testimony was not required to establish the standard of care, and reversed the lower court by holding that Utah’s comparative fault statute applies to intentional torts. The majority adopted the Restatement §317 test and interpreted the statutory definition of “fault” broadly.

Holding

  • Whether NES owed a duty of care to A.R. under a special relationship.. Yes, NES owed a duty to A.R. to exercise reasonable care in hiring, training, and supervising its employees, based on Restatement (Second) of Torts §317.
  • Whether expert testimony is required to establish the standard of care.. No, plaintiffs had no obligation to present expert testimony to establish the standard of care.
  • Whether Utah Code §78B‑5‑818 allows fault to be apportioned for intentional torts.. Yes, the statutory definition of “fault” includes any actionable breach of legal duty, act, or omission, which encompasses intentional torts.

Docket 20121012

Cited authorities

  • L.R. 5
  • 1973 Utah Laws 710
  • 1986 Utah Laws 470
  • 1994 Utah Laws 1022
  • 1973 Utah Laws 710
  • 1986 Utah Laws 471
  • 1986 Utah Laws 471
  • 1986 Utah Laws 470

Cited by