Utah Supreme Court

State of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent v. Chris Alfred Bertul, Defendant and Appellant

May 3, 19831983 Utah LEXIS 1053

Summary

The court held that the booking sheet was improperly excluded under the business-record exception because police reports offered by a criminal defendant to support a defense are ordinarily admissible when the required foundation and indicia of trustworthiness are present. The error was harmless because the sheet did not materially support the defendant's intoxication defense in light of the evidence that he deliberately entered the pharmacy and removed drugs. The court also held that the undisputed evidence established burglary, so no criminal-trespass instruction was required.

Holding

  • Admissibility of the booking sheet. The trial court erred in excluding the booking sheet. A police record offered by a criminal defendant to support a defense may qualify as a business record, including when it contains a conclusion, if the proper foundation establishes regular preparation, temporal proximity, preservation of integrity, and trustworthy sources and preparation circumstances.
  • Prejudice from exclusion of the booking sheet. The exclusion was harmless and did not require reversal.
  • Criminal-trespass lesser-included-offense instruction. The trial court was not required to instruct the jury on criminal trespass.

Docket 17153

Cited authorities

  • Rule 63(13) of the Utah Rules of Evidence
  • Rule 63(13)
  • Rule 63(13)
  • Rule 63(13)
  • Rule 63(13)
  • Rule 63(15)
  • Rule 63(13)

Cited by