Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Leona Fremming v. Estelle Tansey
June 16, 1993626 A.2d 219
Summary
The court held that the defendant's motion to compel employment records and tax returns was substantially justified because the records could bear on the plaintiff's injury, incapacity, and potential lost-earnings claim. The trial justice therefore abused her discretion by imposing attorney's fees under Rule 37(a), particularly where the request was not groundless, harassing, or outrageous. The court granted certiorari, quashed the fee award, and remanded the papers to the Superior Court.
Holding
- Whether sanctions and attorney's fees were warranted under Rule 37(a).. The motion to compel was substantially justified and did not constitute groundless, harassing, abusive, or outrageous discovery conduct; therefore, the trial justice abused her discretion by imposing attorney's fees.
Docket 92-378-M.P.
Cited authorities
- Rule 37(a)
Cited by
- Nancy Willis v. Subaru of America, Inc. Subaru of New England Inc. and Bald Hill Realty Company D/B/A Bald Hill…
- James John Powers v. State of Rhode Island.
- Ruth M. Senn v. Surgidev Corp.
- Kristopher Plante v. Daniel Stack v. Bella Restaurant
- Elena Cipriani
- Elizabeth Donegan v. Neil Jackson, M.D., Lauren Steinhandler, M.D. A/K/A Lauren Hanley, M.D., Women Infants Hospital
- Kristopher Plante v. Daniel Stack v. Bella Restaurant