Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. Fasching

Summary

The Oregon Supreme Court held that to qualify for the business‑records exception under OEC 803(6), the proponent must present evidence of the record‑making practices of the business that created the record; because the plaintiff failed to do so, the trial court’s admission of the documents was erroneous, so the Court of Appeals and trial court judgments were reversed and the case remanded.