Published opinions from 1981. The case name opens the case page.
December 18, 198197 Nev. 601
The court denied the petitions for mandamus because the governing statute allowed the State Engineer to withhold action while related water-rights litigation remained pending, so the Engineer had no clear duty to act.
The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed Rudy Bolden's robbery conviction, holding that substantial evidence supported the jury's verdict. The court declined to reweigh conflicting identification and alibi evidence because credibility determinations belong to the jury and a supported verdict will not be disturbed on appeal.
The Nevada Supreme Court affirmed the judgment enforcing the agreement’s default provision: oral notice was sufficient because the agreement did not require written notice, and the agreement did not indicate that the parties intended a mortgage or other security device subject to foreclosure statutes.