Nebraska Supreme Court, 2014

The court affirmed summary judgment for Wal-Mart because the evidence showed that Wal-Mart neither controlled the construction work nor possessed or controlled the premises. It reversed summary judgment for Graham in part because genuine factual disputes existed about Graham's control over roof-safety practices, its…

The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the Workers’ Compensation Court’s judgment that Gary M. Lenz’s petition for benefits arising after the partial amputation of his fifth metatarsal was timely under the material‑change exception to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48‑137.