Montana Supreme Court
Mickey D. Fonk, Petitioner and Appellant v. Mavanee J. Ulsher, Respondent and Respondent, and J.c.f. and S.j.f…
September 28, 1993260 Mont. 379
Summary
The court held that leaving dissolution papers with the respondent's mother at his residence did not constitute valid personal service under the mandatory service rules, even though the mother testified that he later saw or received the papers. Because the respondent neither personally received service nor voluntarily appeared, the dissolution decree entered by default was void, and the service ruling was reversed and remanded.
Holding
- Validity of service of process in the dissolution proceeding. Service was invalid because the summons and petition were not delivered personally to the respondent, and the respondent's mother was neither authorized to effect service nor appointed to accept service for him. The mother's testimony that the respondent later saw or received the papers could not substitute for compliance with the required service procedures.
Docket 93-140
Cited authorities
- Rule 54(b)
Cited by
- Thomas v. Sanders County Sheriff's Department
- William R. Andersen, Plaintiff and Respondent v. Remi E. Monforton; McCollum, LLC; Jefferson River Ranches, LLC…
- Mueller v. Miller
- David Elliott Fife, Petitioner and Appellant v. Patricia Lee Martin, Respondent and Respondent
- In Re the Marriage of Terry Shikany, Petitioner and Respondent, and Carol L. Shikany, Respondent and Appellant
- In Re the Marriage of Catharine Gay Grounds, F/k/a Catharine Gay Coward, Petitioner and Respondent, and Harold Mark…
- Marriage of Loberg
- William MacPheat, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Steven L. Schauf and Farmers Insurance Group of Companies, Defendants…