Supreme Court of Maryland
State of Maryland v. Charles Terrence Collins
February 7, 2002367 Md. 700
Summary
The Court of Appeals of Maryland affirmed the Court of Special Appeals’ determination that two bail‑bond agents who entered an apartment to locate a defaulting principal were state actors for Fourth Amendment purposes because a police officer’s participation went beyond mere standby. Accordingly, the evidence obtained from that entry must be subject to a Fourth Amendment suppression analysis on remand.
Holding
- Whether bail‑bond agents who entered an apartment, accompanied by a police officer, are state actors for Fourth Amendment purposes.. Yes. The participation of Officer Hook beyond mere presence transformed the agents’ conduct into state action subject to Fourth Amendment scrutiny.
Docket 59, Sept. Term, 2001
Cited authorities
- 42 U.S.C. section 1983
Cited by
- Orlando Byndloss v. State of Maryland
- Robert L. Bost v. State of Maryland
- Chad Eason Frobouck v. State of Maryland
- State of New Mexico v. Adrian L. Gutierrez
- Marc Roberts v. United States
- Adele Florence Freeman v. State of Maryland
- State of Maryland v. Victor Coley
- State of Maryland v. Yerson Rafael Cabral