Ron Monson, Appellant v. Iowa Civil Rights Commission; Inga Bumbary-Langston, as Director of the Iowa Civil Rights… (Iowa 1991)

Summary

The court affirmed dismissal of Monson’s petition for judicial review. It held that the untimely service on the Civil Rights Commission substantially complied with the statutory service requirement because the delay resulted from the sheriff’s error and caused no prejudice, but Monson failed to plead an actionable disability-discrimination claim because the statute protects an employee’s own disability, not the disability of a family member or the burdens of caring for one. The court also rejected Monson’s alternative associative-discrimination theory because the alleged termination resulted from his extended absence rather than his association with a disabled person.

Holding

Timeliness and sufficiency of service of the petition for judicial review. The service requirement was substantially satisfied, and the brief delay in serving the Civil Rights Commission did not deprive the district court of jurisdiction because the sheriff’s mistake was not fairly attributable to Monson and the Commission showed no prejudice.

Whether Monson pleaded an actionable disability-discrimination claim. Monson failed to state a claim because the disability-discrimination provisions protect an employee who has an impairment substantially limiting a major life activity, not an employee who is burdened by caring for a disabled family member.

Whether the termination constituted associative discrimination. Monson’s associative-discrimination theory did not state a claim because the alleged termination was based on his extended absence from work, not on his association with a disabled person.

Summary

Holding

Cited by