Illinois Supreme Court
In Re Estate of Rennick
January 29, 1998181 Ill. 2d 395
Summary
The Illinois Supreme Court affirmed the appellate court’s decision that admissions made by a party in a discovery deposition are admissible against the party’s estate, and that the circuit court’s summary‑judgment ruling was erroneous. The court based its holding on a plain‑text construction of Supreme Court Rule 212 and applied de novo review to the summary‑judgment order.
Holding
- Whether admissions contained in a party’s discovery deposition are admissible against the party’s estate under Rule 212(a)(2).. Admissions contained in a discovery deposition are admissible against a decedent’s estate.
- Whether the circuit court’s summary‑judgment order is reviewed de novo as a question of law.. Summary‑judgment orders are reviewed de novo because they involve questions of law.
Docket 82872
Cited authorities
- Rule 212
- Rule 212(a)(2)
- Rule 212(a)(2)
- R. 212(a)(2)
- R. 2(a)
- R. 206(c)(1)
- R. 206(c)(2)
- Rule 212(a)(2)
Cited by
- Joan Dachs Bais Yaakoe Elementary School v. Culvers Transportation Inc
- The People of the State of Illinois, Appellant v. Brent E. Marker, Appellee
- The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee v. Aaron Jamar Houston, Appellant
- The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee v. Christopher Henderson, Appellant
- Shirley Robidoux, Indiv. and as Ex’r of the Estate of Harvey Robidoux, Deceased, Appellee v. Uretz J. Oliphant…
- Repa v. Napierkowski
- Midstate Siding and Window Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant v. Kenneth Rogers, Defendants-Appellees
- The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Evelyn Santiago, Defendant-Appellee