Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999

After granting certiorari to examine the Court of Appeals' treatment of appellants' single-enumeration, multi-argument challenge to the denial of their motion to suppress, the Supreme Court of Georgia rejected the practice of declining, under OCGA § 5-6-40, to review assertions of error lumped within one enumeration.

The court affirmed admission of the will to probate because the evidence did not establish the confidential relationship and beneficiary dominance required to trigger a rebuttable presumption of undue influence. The evidence also did not demand a finding that the will resulted from actual undue influence.