Supreme Court of Colorado
Board of County Commissioners of Morgan County, Colorado, Petitioner v. Rainsford J. Winslow, Respondent
September 30, 19851985 Colo. LEXIS 494
Summary
The court held that a district court has jurisdiction to enjoin a litigant from filing actions or pleadings pro se within the counties of that judicial district when the litigant has seriously abused the judicial process. Because the court of appeals incorrectly concluded that only the supreme court could issue such an injunction, the judgment was reversed and the case was remanded for consideration of Winslow's remaining challenges, including whether the injunction was an abuse of discretion. No separate opinions were issued.
Holding
- District-court authority to restrict pro se filings. A district court, acting as a court of equity and general jurisdiction, has jurisdiction and inherent authority to enjoin a litigant from filing suits or pleadings pro se within any county in that judicial district when the court finds a serious abuse of the judicial process. The injunction may not extend beyond the district's boundaries.
Docket 83SC415
Cited by
- The Board of County Commissioners of Morgan County, Colorado v. Rainsford J. Winslow
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Petitioner-Appellant v. Earle Broadnax, Respondent-Appellee…
- Rainsford J. Winslow, Plaintiffs v. Governor Roy Romer, Defendants
- State Ex Rel. Billy Roy Tyler, Relator v. Douglas County District Court, Respondent
- James Riffin v. Circuit Court for Baltimore County
- Burnice Joe Birdo, Appellant v. Dr. J.m. Holbrook, Sharon E. Nelon, and Tarrant County, Texas, Appellees
- James Jacob Jordan, Appellant v. the State of Nevada on Relation of the Department of Motor Vehicles and Public…
- In Re Gabriel Karr; Donald H. Meyer; Suzanne Meyer; L. Douglas Beatty; Beatty, Gresham & Colerick, LLP; Zane Bowers…