The court held that counsel who has completed the required first-appeal procedure and found no meritorious issue need not petition for discretionary review when the client demands it. The defendant may seek review pro se, but the court will not search the record for error at that stage.
Arizona Supreme Court, 1984
Published opinions from 1984. The case name opens the case page.
1984 opinions
ArizonaDarner Motor Sales, Inc., D/b/a Darner Leasing Co., an Arizona Corporation, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, V…
March 29, 1984140 Ariz. 383
The Arizona Supreme Court, sitting en banc, vacated the court of appeals decision and reversed summary judgment for Universal Underwriters and its agent Doxsee, holding that an insured's failure to read an unambiguous boiler-plate policy is not an absolute bar to recovery on theories of equitable estoppel…
ArizonaSteven Randall Pool and Bruce Kevin Phillips v. Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of…
January 4, 1984139 Ariz. 98
Accepting special action jurisdiction, the Arizona Supreme Court held that retrial of Steven Pool is barred by the double jeopardy clause of art. 2, § 10 of the Arizona Constitution because the prosecutor's egregiously improper cross-examination was intentional conduct, known to be improper and prejudicial, pursued…