Supreme Court of the United States
Moody v. NetChoice, LLC
July 1, 2024603 U.S. 707
Summary
The Supreme Court vacated the Eleventh and Fifth Circuits' judgments and remanded the cases because the appellate courts failed to conduct a proper facial First Amendment analysis of Florida and Texas statutes regulating social‑media platforms. The Court emphasized that facial challenges require assessing the statutes' full scope and the balance of constitutional versus unconstitutional applications.
Holding
- Whether the appellate courts properly analyzed the facial First Amendment challenges to the Florida and Texas statutes.. The judgments of the Eleventh and Fifth Circuits are vacated and the cases remanded because the courts failed to conduct the requisite facial analysis of the statutes' full range of applications.
Docket 22-277
Cited authorities
- Tex. Code Ann. §§120.001
- CA11
- CA11
- CA11
- CA11
- CA11
- CA10
- CA11
Cited by
- John Doe v. John Burlew
- State ex rel. Yost v. Google, L.L.C.
- In Re TikTok Inc.; TikTok Ltd.; TikTok Pte. Ltd.; TikTok U.S. Data Security Inc.; ByteDance Ltd.; and ByteDance Inc…
- In Re TikTok Inc.; TikTok Ltd.; TikTok Pte. Ltd.; TikTok U.S. Data Security Inc.; ByteDance Ltd.; and ByteDance Inc…
- NetChoice v. Anthony G. Brown
- Taking Offense v. State of California
- United States v. Curry
- TikTok Inc. v. Garland