Supreme Court of the United States

Santos-Zacaria v. Garland

May 11, 2023598 U.S. 411

Summary

Justice Jackson's opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, held that 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1)'s administrative-exhaustion requirement is nonjurisdictional and subject to waiver and forfeiture. It also held that the provision does not require seeking discretionary Board of Immigration Appeals reconsideration, even to present an objection arising from the Board's decision. The Court vacated the portion of the Fifth Circuit's judgment dismissing Santos-Zacaria's petition for review and remanded. Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, concurred in the judgment because reconsideration was discretionary and therefore unnecessary for exhaustion; he would not have decided the jurisdictional question.

Holding

  • Whether § 1252(d)(1)'s exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional.. The exhaustion requirement is a nonjurisdictional claim-processing rule subject to waiver and forfeiture.
  • Whether exhausting remedies available as of right requires seeking Board reconsideration.. Section 1252(d)(1) does not require seeking discretionary Board reconsideration, including to present an issue not previously raised before the agency.

Docket 21-1436

Cited authorities

Cited by