Supreme Court of the United States
Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for P. R. v. Centro De Periodismo Investigativo, Inc.
May 11, 2023598 U.S. 339
Summary
The Court, in an opinion by Justice Kagan joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Sotomayor, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Jackson, held that PROMESA does not categorically abrogate any sovereign immunity enjoyed by Puerto Rico’s Financial Oversight and Management Board. Assuming without deciding that Puerto Rico and the Board possess immunity in federal court, the Court concluded that PROMESA lacks the unmistakably clear statement necessary to abrogate it outside the statute’s Title III debt-restructuring provisions. The Court reversed and remanded. Justice Thomas dissented alone, arguing that the Court should decide the antecedent immunity question and affirm because the Board had not established that it possessed the state sovereign immunity it asserted.
Holding
- Whether PROMESA categorically abrogates the Board’s assumed sovereign immunity.. PROMESA does not categorically abrogate the Board’s sovereign immunity outside its express incorporation of bankruptcy immunity-abrogation provisions for Title III proceedings. The Court assumes without deciding that Puerto Rico and the Board otherwise enjoy immunity in federal court.
Docket 22-96
Cited authorities
Cited by
- Phillip Hill v. State of New Hampshire Department of Corrections
- Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Corporacion Cimex, S.a. (cuba)
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: J.A.D., Child (A24-0317), State of Minnesota v. Patrick Junior Jordan, ...
- Carbonell v. Lopez Figueroa
- State of Texas v. DHS
- Villegas Sarabia v. Mayorkas
- China Unicom (Americas) Opera v. FCC
- Beeland Properties, LLC v. TDP Group, LLC