Supreme Court of the United States
Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski
June 23, 2023599 U.S. 736
Summary
Justice Kavanaugh, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett, held that a district court must stay its pretrial and trial proceedings during an interlocutory appeal under 9 U. S. C. §16(a) from the denial of a motion to compel arbitration. Applying Griggs, the Court reasoned that the entire merits proceeding is involved in an appeal determining whether the dispute belongs in court or arbitration. The Court reversed the Ninth Circuit and remanded. Justice Jackson dissented, joined in full by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan and as to Parts II–IV by Justice Thomas. The dissent maintained that stays should remain discretionary, that Griggs prevents simultaneous review of the same order rather than all merits proceedings, and that an automatic stay improperly favors parties seeking arbitration.
Holding
- Whether an interlocutory appeal from the denial of a motion to compel arbitration requires a stay of district court proceedings.. A district court must stay its pretrial and trial proceedings while an interlocutory appeal under §16(a) concerning arbitrability is ongoing; matters not involved in the appeal, such as costs and attorney’s fees, may still proceed.
Docket 22-105
Cited authorities
- CA11
- CA10
- CA10
- CA11
- 26 U.S.C. §7482
- 9 U.S.C. §16
- 9 U.S.C. §16
- 9 U.S.C. §16
Cited by
- Kersey v. Republican National Committee
- Jason Bruening v. OneMain Financial Group, LLC
- City of Martinsville, Virginia v. Express Scripts, Inc.
- Smith v. Spizzirri
- Gillespie v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store Incorporated
- Fox v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
- Greer v. County of San Diego
- Jonna v. Bitcoin Latinum