Supreme Court of the United States

Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas

June 15, 2022596 U.S. 685

Summary

The Court, in an opinion by Justice Gorsuch joined by Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Barrett, held that the Restoration Act prohibits on tribal lands only gaming activities that Texas bans outright, rather than incorporating all Texas gaming regulations as federal law. The statutory distinction between prohibition and regulation, its structure, and the context supplied by Cabazon supported that reading. The Court vacated the Fifth Circuit’s judgment and remanded without deciding whether the Tribe’s electronic bingo constituted a regulated or prohibited activity or the extent to which IGRA applied. Chief Justice Roberts dissented, joined by Justices Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh. He argued that the statutory text, the referenced tribal resolution, and the Act’s structure incorporated all Texas substantive gaming restrictions while requiring enforcement in federal court rather than through state regulatory authorities.

Holding

  • Whether the Restoration Act subjects gaming on the Tribe’s lands to all Texas gaming regulations.. The Restoration Act prohibits as a matter of federal law only gaming activities that Texas prohibits outright; it does not incorporate Texas regulations governing otherwise permissible gaming activities.

Docket 20-493

Cited authorities

Cited by