Supreme Court of the United States
AMG Capital Management, LLC v. FTC
April 22, 2021593 U.S. 67
Summary
Justice Breyer, writing for a unanimous Court, held that §13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act does not authorize the FTC to seek, or courts to award, equitable monetary relief such as restitution or disgorgement. The provision authorizes prospective injunctive relief, while other provisions expressly authorize monetary relief subject to conditions and limitations that the FTC cannot bypass through §13(b). The Court rejected arguments based on traditional equitable powers, congressional acquiescence, and policy considerations, reversed the Ninth Circuit’s judgment, and remanded for further proceedings. There were no separate opinions.
Holding
- Whether §13(b)’s authorization of a permanent injunction includes equitable monetary relief.. Section 13(b) does not authorize the FTC to seek, or a court to award, equitable monetary relief such as restitution or disgorgement.
Docket 19-508
Cited authorities
- 15 U.S.C. §§45
- 15 U.S.C. §§45
- 87 Stat. 592
- 15 U.S.C. §53
- 15 U.S.C. §45
- 15 U.S.C. §53
- 68 FR 45821
- 77 FR 47071