Supreme Court of the United States

Marcelo Manrique, Petitioner v. United States.

April 19, 2017581 U.S. 116

Summary

The Supreme Court held that a defendant must file a separate notice of appeal from a restitution order in a deferred restitution case; a single notice filed after the initial judgment does not suffice to review the later‑determined restitution amount, and therefore affirmed the Eleventh Circuit’s dismissal of the appeal.

Holding

  • Whether a single notice of appeal filed after the initial judgment but before the amended judgment imposing restitution suffices to invoke appellate review of the restitution amount.. No. A defendant must file a separate notice of appeal from the restitution order (the amended judgment) to obtain appellate review of the restitution amount.

Docket 15–7250.

Cited authorities

  • CA11
  • CA11
  • CA11
  • 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252
  • 18 U.S.C. § 3742
  • Fed. R. App. P. 3(a)(1)
  • 18 U.S.C. §§ 3582
  • Fed. R. Crim. P. 37(a)(2)

Cited by

Read full opinionPDF