Supreme Court of the United States

Expressions Hair Design, Petitioners v. Eric T. Schneiderman

March 29, 2017581 U.S. 37

Summary

The Court held that New York's credit-card surcharge prohibition regulates speech, rather than merely prices, as applied to merchants wishing to post a cash price and an additional credit-card surcharge. It accepted the Second Circuit's interpretation that the statute prohibits that pricing display, rejected the merchants' as-applied vagueness challenge, and vacated and remanded for consideration of whether the speech restriction survives First Amendment scrutiny. Breyer concurred in the judgment, favoring analysis of the First Amendment interests affected rather than a speech–conduct distinction and suggesting certification to clarify the statute. Sotomayor, joined by Alito, concurred in the judgment but would have directed certification to the New York Court of Appeals before resolving the constitutional questions.

Holding

  • Whether § 518 prohibits the merchants' proposed single-sticker pricing display.. For purposes of this as-applied challenge, § 518 prohibits posting a cash price and separately stating an additional credit-card surcharge.
  • Whether § 518 regulates speech or only prices.. As applied to the challenged single-sticker pricing practice, § 518 regulates speech. Whether that regulation survives First Amendment scrutiny must be considered on remand.
  • Whether § 518 is unconstitutionally vague as applied to these merchants.. The statute is not vague as applied to the merchants' intended single-sticker pricing display.

Docket 15–1391.

Cited authorities

  • N.Y. Law § 518
  • N.Y. Law § 518
  • N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 518
  • 88 Stat. 1515
  • 90 Stat. 197
  • 95 Stat. 144
  • N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 518
  • N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law Ann. § 518

Cited by

Expressions Hair Design, Petitioners v. Eric T. Schneiderman (SCOTUS 2017) | LawDiver