Supreme Court of the United States
Robert J. Wittman, Appellants v. Gloria Personhuballah
May 23, 2016578 U.S. 539
Summary
The Supreme Court held that the ten Members of Congress who intervened lack standing to appeal the district court’s decision striking down Virginia’s congressional redistricting plan, and therefore dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Holding
- Do the intervenor Members of Congress have standing to appeal the district court's decision striking down Virginia's congressional redistricting plan?. The intervenors lack standing; the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Docket 14–1504.
Cited authorities
Cited by
- Cahoo v. SAS Analytics Inc.
- Gloria Personhuballah v. James B. Alcorn
- Gloria Personhuballah v. James B. Alcorn — Payne, J., Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part
- Sixta Gladys Peña Martínez, Nélida Santiago Álvarez, Juan Ramón Vélez Marrero, María Luisa Aguilar Galíndez, Gamaly…
- Deric James Liddell Caldwell/naacp, Ken Ross, Jr. Lediva Pierce, Intervenor United States of America, Intervenor V…
- Matthews v. State of Illinois, The
- Cahoo v. SAS Analytics Inc.
- Jill Stein v. Pedro A. Cortés