Supreme Court of the United States
Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.
May 24, 1999526 U.S. 795
Summary
The unanimous Court held that applying for or receiving Social Security Disability Insurance benefits neither automatically estops a claimant from pursuing an ADA employment-discrimination claim nor creates a special presumption against that claim. The statutes can coexist because SSDI determinations do not consider reasonable accommodation and may reflect administrative presumptions or circumstances different from those relevant to the ADA claim. Nevertheless, to survive summary judgment, a plaintiff must sufficiently explain an apparent inconsistency between a prior assertion of total disability and her claim that she could perform her job’s essential functions with or without reasonable accommodation. The Court vacated the Fifth Circuit’s judgment and remanded to permit the parties to present or contest Cleveland’s explanations. There were no separate opinions.
Holding
- Effect of an SSDI application or award on an ADA employment-discrimination claim.. Applying for or receiving SSDI benefits does not automatically estop an ADA claim or create a special negative presumption against its success.
- The plaintiff’s burden to explain apparently inconsistent disability representations at summary judgment.. An ADA plaintiff must explain an apparent contradiction between her prior SSDI assertion of total disability and her claimed ability to perform essential job functions. The explanation must permit a reasonable juror to conclude that, assuming the earlier statement’s truth or the plaintiff’s good-faith belief in it, she could nevertheless perform those functions with or without reasonable accommodation.
Docket 97-1008
Cited authorities
- 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101
- 42 U.S.C. §§ 422
- CA10
- 42 U.S.C. § 423(e)(1)
- CA10
- CA11
- 42 U.S.C. § 423
- 104 Stat. 331