Supreme Court of the United States

United States v. Gonzales

March 3, 1997520 U.S. 1

Summary

The Court, in an opinion by Justice O'Connor, held that 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) prohibits a federal court from making a firearms sentence concurrent with any other prison term, including a previously imposed state sentence. The statute does not require that the firearms sentence be served first or restrict the court's authority to make other sentences concurrent under § 3584. The Court vacated the Tenth Circuit's judgment and remanded. Justice Stevens, joined by Justice Breyer, dissented, arguing that the provision concerns only federal sentences and that the majority's interpretation creates unjustified disparities depending on the order of state and federal prosecutions. Justice Breyer, joined by Justice Stevens, separately dissented, emphasizing the potentially duplicative punishment where a state has already imposed a firearms enhancement resembling § 924(c).

Holding

  • Whether a § 924(c) sentence may run concurrently with a previously imposed state sentence.. A federal district court may not order a § 924(c) sentence to run concurrently with any other prison term, whether state or federal.
  • Whether § 924(c) dictates the sequence of sentences or prevents other sentences from running concurrently.. Section 924(c) does not require the firearms sentence to be served first and does not limit the court's authority under § 3584 to make other federal sentences concurrent with or consecutive to other state or federal prison terms.

Docket 95-1605

Cited authorities

Cited by